i'm trying to like power, corruption and lies. tell me why you like it. thankyou

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
i'm waiting to enjoy it

Charlie Howard (the sphinx), Thursday, 12 October 2006 14:20 (nineteen years ago)

i like the cover. and the guitars. and the beats. and the songs.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 12 October 2006 14:23 (nineteen years ago)

You had to be there, I guess...

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 12 October 2006 14:23 (nineteen years ago)

To put it in a nutshell:

"...so why don't you piss off?"

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 12 October 2006 14:24 (nineteen years ago)

i like the inner sleeve. i like the record label design.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 12 October 2006 14:25 (nineteen years ago)

The opening triple whammy, for starters. 'Your Silent Face' and 'Leave Me Alone' to dispel any doubts.

Baaderonixx in the year of the locusts (baaderonixx), Thursday, 12 October 2006 14:25 (nineteen years ago)

i like the synths. i like the haircuts.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 12 October 2006 14:26 (nineteen years ago)

Although, I can relate to Charlie as it's the album that took me longest to get into, probably because of all the "Blue Monday" derived doodlings scattered across the album.

Baaderonixx in the year of the locusts (baaderonixx), Thursday, 12 October 2006 14:26 (nineteen years ago)

i like the riffs. i like the hooks. i like the melodies.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 12 October 2006 14:27 (nineteen years ago)

"Age Of Consent" is the greatest single they never released.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 12 October 2006 14:27 (nineteen years ago)

you have a sharp memory mr. carlin

sometimes in order to give a record it's fair due, you need discerning music listeners to give it the thumbs up and the all clear. hence this thread. cheers so far

Charlie Howard (the sphinx), Thursday, 12 October 2006 14:27 (nineteen years ago)

it's not that good, but then i'm not that discerning.

benrique (Enrique), Thursday, 12 October 2006 14:28 (nineteen years ago)

Because it is a good album and they weren't total cunts at the time!

Also, "Age of Consent" is fucking awesome.

The Real Esteban Buttez (EstieButtez1), Thursday, 12 October 2006 14:28 (nineteen years ago)

i like my memory of buying it at the harvard coop along with a copy of closer and the thick plastic sleeve that it came in with a power corruption and lies sticker on the front of it.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 12 October 2006 14:29 (nineteen years ago)

i like that it made living in brookfield, connecticut a little more bearable. same with the blue monday 12-inch. i like that i never had a copy that tacked blue monday onto the end of the album. didn't they do this? or am i making that up?

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 12 October 2006 14:32 (nineteen years ago)

I had (might even still have) the USA cassette version with some of the titles given as the 'working title' versions.

Like "Kwi" for example. I forget which...

xpost I think Blue Monday was on it, as well as the b-side.

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 12 October 2006 14:34 (nineteen years ago)

It was the first album I ever heard by them and is still my favorite by far. In many ways it's their most unique album because they don't sound shackled by their JD roots anymore but at the same time they haven't developed NO pop blueprint yet either. I'd really like for them to make another record like this, where they're basically just fucking around. 'S.T.R.E.E.T.D.A.D.' by Out Hud gives me a bit of a PCL fix.

Scott Warner (thream), Thursday, 12 October 2006 14:34 (nineteen years ago)

unknown pleasure made goteborg, sweden a little more bearable for me (bad breakup, bad sleep patterns etc.). great city though...

ok, i'm gonna try and digest the whole record (p,c, and l) before bed. i'm waiting to have one of those epiphanies with this.

Charlie Howard (the sphinx), Thursday, 12 October 2006 14:37 (nineteen years ago)

What everyone else said, mostly.

"Everybody makes mistakes...even me..."

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 12 October 2006 14:37 (nineteen years ago)

pleasures

that sounds like a really good analysis, both scotts

Charlie Howard (the sphinx), Thursday, 12 October 2006 14:38 (nineteen years ago)

I think they tacked Blue Monday into the middle and the Blue Monday b-side The Beach on th end.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Thursday, 12 October 2006 14:39 (nineteen years ago)

Scott Warner OTM. I've come around enough so that I wish they'd attempted songs like "We All Stand" on other albums.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 12 October 2006 14:40 (nineteen years ago)

I think they tacked Blue Monday into the middle and the Blue Monday b-side The Beach on th end.

On the American CD, yes.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 12 October 2006 14:43 (nineteen years ago)

I also recommened listening to "5 8 6" whilst travelling on a train.

The Real Esteban Buttez (EstieButtez1), Thursday, 12 October 2006 14:45 (nineteen years ago)

great Latour cover art. If i could choose a song that would preceed me wherever i went, it would probably be "Age of
Consent"...at least every now and then.

J. Grizzle (trainsmoke), Thursday, 12 October 2006 14:46 (nineteen years ago)

I had (might even still have) the USA cassette version with some of the titles given as the 'working title' versions

That's the version I've got as well. I like "5-8-6" best but being a onetime CIF I like the Peel Session version even more.

Jeff W (zebedee), Thursday, 12 October 2006 14:52 (nineteen years ago)

'the village' is a really nice contrast to the moody, spacious 'we all stand'

Charlie Howard (the sphinx), Thursday, 12 October 2006 14:55 (nineteen years ago)

Here 'tis..

Side 1

1. Age Of Consent
2. We All Stand
3. The Village
4. 5-6-8
5. Blue Monday

Side 2

1. Kwi
2. Ultraviolence
3. Only The Lonely
4. Leave Me Alone
5. The Beach

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 12 October 2006 15:01 (nineteen years ago)

i am so against blue monday and the beach being on there like that. it's so wrong. but if that's the way you heard it first, i guess it seems normal.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 12 October 2006 15:15 (nineteen years ago)

I love the record. Why? Because of the way the sloppy playing humanizes the programmed stuff. Because of the way the perfect melodies mesh so well with the loose fiddling with the nascent technology. Because of the hint of optimism that shows up, esp. in light of its predecessor. Because of Steve's frenetic but slightly less tribal drums. Because of the way, to this day, I'm still not sure how it was made, or how these songs came from the same band that made "Movement." Similarly, because the band caught near-death crapping through that live NYC performance recently released on DVD more or less went right back into the studio and came up with something as vibrant and beautiful as "P, C L."

Etc.

Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Thursday, 12 October 2006 15:32 (nineteen years ago)

i'll be a sad sad geek and point out that the working title for YSF was not kwi but kw1 ie Kraftwerk 1.
this was my favourite album as a teenager, its at the point when they still sound a bit angsty but are just getting to grips with the drum machine pop stuff. (well albumwise, i guess it really started with the procession/egg single. god i love that record.)

zappi (joni), Thursday, 12 October 2006 15:43 (nineteen years ago)

Similarly, because the band caught near-death crapping through that live NYC performance recently released on DVD

The Taras Schevenko gig? Fie on you. That show is so great that it sent me back to Movement to see if I missed anything (sadly, I didn't).

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 12 October 2006 15:47 (nineteen years ago)

Is that show circa 1981? I like it, but the band looks like they're about to die on stage.

I'll be a sadder geek and point out that (I think) YSF was originally TK1, as in "that Kraftwerk one." But that's six of one, half a dozen of the other.

Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Thursday, 12 October 2006 15:49 (nineteen years ago)

that's funny, scott - i had the cassette, so that's the only way i knew it. (my mom sent me the cassette while i was at summer camp -- i'd requested it, she's not THAT cool -- and also included the smiths' "the queen is dead," and i remember how much i liked the fact that those covers were kinda sorta almost the same color. that seemed special, at the time. but then, when i was a little kid i arranged all my books either by the color of their spine or by the publisher, which i guess meant i was destined to grow up to be a label whore.) anyway, i can't imagine my experience of the album without "the beach," it just seems to anchor the whole thing for me...

philip sherburne (philip sherburne), Thursday, 12 October 2006 16:19 (nineteen years ago)

Taras Schevenko rocks...the movement stuff sounds great and is tempered by an early version of Temptation, with unfinished lyrics.

The music geek in me wants to answer this question:

how these songs came from the same band that made "Movement."

with this:

http://www.physicsenterprises.andrews.edu/~clark/emusic/voyetra/images/voyetra8.jpg
http://www.physicsenterprises.andrews.edu/~clark/emusic/voyetra/v8.html

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Thursday, 12 October 2006 16:21 (nineteen years ago)

another odd memory of that record -- when i got it, it must've been 1986; i would have been 15. i had discovered new order from "low-life," which was their current album at the time. (i heard "the perfect kiss" somewhere, god knows where, and bought the album.) but when i got "power corruption and lies," somehow it felt like i was reaching back into the distant past; somehow i was very aware that i was hearing the document of a band that didn't exist (like that) any more. why was that? it was only three years since "power, corruption and lies" had come out, and if anything i suspect the pop world moved more slowly then. somehow, in my mind i was listening to a document that seemed beamed into the future from some faraway point in new wave history, when in reality it was a pretty contemporary record. as i sunk deeper into goth/new wave stuff, 1981-83 was generally my favorite period, and somehow it seemed so far away, like i was terribly inauthentic to be this kid from portland, oregon who only discovered the music through, like, "head on the door" in 1985.

do kids like this feel this way? will some 15-year old buy M.I.A.'s next album, and then go back and, discovering "arular," consider it some kind of benjaminian angel of history?

(oddly, in much the same way, i still can't help but think of "brotherhood" as "that new new order album," since that's how i thought of it when it came out -- the first of their records i knew about in advance of its release. i was now IN THE KNOW and boy, did i cherish that status.)

philip sherburne (philip sherburne), Thursday, 12 October 2006 16:32 (nineteen years ago)

I'm glad other people are confirming my thoughts about Your Silent Face and Kraftwerk. YSP sounds like the next version of "The Model". I especially like all the synths on this album, and thinking about what it would have been like if Ian was singing, ie, the lyrics would have been better.

mat maiellro (chelvis), Thursday, 12 October 2006 16:32 (nineteen years ago)

whoops, meant to say, do kids TODAY feel this way?

philip sherburne (philip sherburne), Thursday, 12 October 2006 16:33 (nineteen years ago)

"so great that it sent me back to Movement to see if I missed anything (sadly, I didn't)."

try again, please!

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 12 October 2006 16:38 (nineteen years ago)

whoops, meant to say, do kids TODAY feel this way?

C'mon, Phil, of course they will. That's a crazy question.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 12 October 2006 16:40 (nineteen years ago)

so this seems like a good time to repeat that kraftwerk anecdote that i read somwhere. how kraftwerk were so blown away by blue monday that they had to go visit new order and see their studio and there reaction was basically: you have GOT to be kidding us. you made that on THIS crap. and they went away shaking their robot heads.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 12 October 2006 16:42 (nineteen years ago)

You mean they slowly turned their robot heads from side to side.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 12 October 2006 16:43 (nineteen years ago)

"i had discovered new order from "low-life,"

when low-life came out i bought the casette copy that came in the swank box. such a luxurious setting for a tape.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 12 October 2006 16:44 (nineteen years ago)

that's a relief, honestly. i wasn't being snarky (or old-fogeyed); i'm really curious how the immediacy (or imitation thereof) afforded by the internet will affect kids' relationship to music. pre-internet, living in the 'burbs, everything was imbued with a sense of mystery because it was (relatively) difficult to find; you could go months between, say, reading the name "clan of xymox" in the front pages of i-D, deciding they were something you wanted to hear, and then actually tracking them down in some import store downtown, where you weren't really supposed to be. i do think that google/blogs/downloading etc erases some of that distance (and in a very real way, the temporal distance--that was several months of my life there spent searching, just on a hunch), so i'm curious to see what exactly the effect is.

philip sherburne (philip sherburne), Thursday, 12 October 2006 16:46 (nineteen years ago)

xpost

fuck yeah, i had the deluxe box for "closer" (bought much later, obv).... wish i knew what happened to that thing.

philip sherburne (philip sherburne), Thursday, 12 October 2006 16:46 (nineteen years ago)

x-post re: Kraftwerk.

Hence the New Order mystery. The question is not with what did they make those songs, but how? Kind of in the VU sense: who is playing what? How much was written in advance or just worked on in the studio? Did they spend hours crafting each bit, or kind of leave it as is? Did some songs take months to write/complete? Days? Hours? Minutes?

Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Thursday, 12 October 2006 16:48 (nineteen years ago)

"somehow it felt like i was reaching back into the distant past;"

like i said, i bought power, corruption, & lies and closer on the same day. thoroughly confusing. i already had and loved unknown pleasures by then, but it was still a bizarre juxtaposition. i had never heard new order till i bought that record. i might have bought blue monday that day too, but i can't remember. if not, i got it soon after. and then when confusion came out...! luckily, i loved both death AND disco.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 12 October 2006 16:50 (nineteen years ago)

so i'm curious to see what exactly the effect is

Discovery as such will take different forms, like music consumption does. It might not be a months-waiting process anymore (and frankly I'm all fine with that), but you'll still get people hearing about strange groups they're unfamiliar with, mentions of acts that are sufficiently old/obscure enough not to have some sort of entrenched web presence, etc. Revelations will still happen as they do, by intent, by chance, by accident.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 12 October 2006 16:53 (nineteen years ago)

i wonder how it affects listening habits though. when all i could afford was one or two new records at a time, i really really listened to them! i absorbed them thoroughly. if i had had access to a million albums, i don't know if i would have heard things the same way.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 12 October 2006 16:57 (nineteen years ago)

I must say, most everyone is posting thoughtful blurbs. I can't wait to relisten to the album tonight.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 12 October 2006 17:02 (nineteen years ago)

I wouldn't confuse ready availability with lack of focus, honestly. I don't think the two are automatically part and parcel.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 12 October 2006 17:03 (nineteen years ago)

the name "power, corruption and lies" reminds me of another way my listening habits have changed, and i suspect this is simply the difference between being 15 and being 35: these days, i could give a fuck what a record is called, what the lyrics are, how the band looks, etc. (obviously part of this is my pro-faceless-techno-bollox baggage.) but i remember being absolutely captivated by the title "power, corruption and lies," being swept up in the grandeur of if, the menace. at 15 (and a sort of overprotected, nerdy 15), it seemed to suggest things that i wasn't supposed to know about. the same with the lyrics on "low-life." today, if i heard lyrics like those i'd just shake my head and laugh, probably. but as an impressionable little tyke, man, what vistas they suggested.

philip sherburne (philip sherburne), Thursday, 12 October 2006 17:03 (nineteen years ago)

It's true that I heard it this way first, but I really can't imagine the album without "Blue Monday" and "The Beach." "Blue Monday" in the middle there just makes so much sense, since it feels like with "The Village" and "5-8-6" that they're constantly building to something, the album's centerpiece. I don't see how that could be anything but "Blue Monday". And "The Beach" at the end is the perfect coda to the album--closing with "Leave Me Alone" just strikes me as a very un-New Order sort of move.

The Good Dr. Bill (The Good Dr. Bill), Thursday, 12 October 2006 17:04 (nineteen years ago)

You had to be there, I guess...

otm

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Thursday, 12 October 2006 17:08 (nineteen years ago)

Philip's posts remind me of my first NO experience: through the first Electronic album, which was played a lot on my college radio station. The affected carelessness of Sumner's lyrics, coupled with those winsome vocals, really touched a nerve. Subsequently I bought a used vinyl copy of Low-Life; the sheer obliqueness of so much of the songwriting was enthralling. The monochrome Peter Saville shots of the band, the absence of credits, the seeming vacuity of the lyrics – I wasn't sure if the album was a con job. Regardless, the ambiguity informed much of my pleasure.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 12 October 2006 17:09 (nineteen years ago)

i wonder how it affects listening habits though. when all i could afford was one or two new records at a time, i really really listened to them! i absorbed them thoroughly. if i had had access to a million albums, i don't know if i would have heard things the same way

that is a good question. I know that i don't listen as deeply as i used to--you know, really get the integral feel of the album. the quick access has corrupted my habits, and i have to get back. also (and this point is old hat), there is so much to be said for the artifact of the music..the sleeve, the liner notes: it all created a hollistic presence with each album. I personally need to get back to that.

J. Grizzle (trainsmoke), Thursday, 12 October 2006 17:09 (nineteen years ago)

My experience with this album very similar to Phil's upthread: I bought Low Life first (because of the CREEM review!) and then moved on to P C & L . I also remember thinking P C & L sounded "old" compared to the new album and it took me a few listens before I was completely drawn in. I also owned these on cassette!

I played Low Life (vinyl!) for the first time in years the other night and was once again struck by the awesomeness of it all, especially "Sub Culture" -- did this ever get released as a 12" ?

Jay Vee's Return (Manon_69), Thursday, 12 October 2006 18:34 (nineteen years ago)

Well heck yes, sir, it's on the Substance compilation!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 12 October 2006 18:34 (nineteen years ago)

Sub Culture 12" is EPIC.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Thursday, 12 October 2006 18:36 (nineteen years ago)

Figures. I never bought Substance! For shame.

Jay Vee's Return (Manon_69), Thursday, 12 October 2006 19:59 (nineteen years ago)

"Age of Consent" and then "Your Silent Face".

Better that the entire output of the vast majority of everybody else ever.

kingfish prætor (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 13 October 2006 03:42 (nineteen years ago)

Figures. I never bought Substance! For shame.

OUT.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 13 October 2006 04:09 (nineteen years ago)

the absence of credits, the seeming vacuity of the lyrics – I wasn't sure if the album was a con job.

Absolutely! I had the same reaction when jumping on the wagon with Brotherhood. It seemed tantalizingly halfbaked compared to, um, Dire Straits, or whatever my classmates approved of in 1986.

Nag! Nag! Nag! (Nag! Nag! Nag!), Friday, 13 October 2006 04:51 (nineteen years ago)

this has always been my favorite NO record -- even when i didn't like NO. will elaborate further after i get my beauty sleep :-)

Eisbär (llamasfur), Friday, 13 October 2006 07:06 (nineteen years ago)

Side 2

1. Kwi
2. Ultraviolence
3. Only The Lonely
4. Leave Me Alone
5. The Beach

New Order still call Your Silent Face 'KW1' (Zappi was right upthread KW1 = Kraftwerk one) - on setlists they still write KW1.

[As an aside, they did 'These Days' earlier this week at Bournemouth!]

It's my second favourite NO album, after Movement. The new technology, sequencers and the like, still sounds *fresh* and experimental and there's a spare simplicity about the whole album that they lost soon after. Great as TPK and the rest of the 85-87 material is - sometimes chucking in the everything but kitchen sink didn't *quite* work for the best. Thieves Like Us and Lonesome Tonight fit well with the spirit of PCL - the former a slow building synth epic and the latter mirroring the carefulness of Leave Me Alone, but at a slower pace. Both would fit well on the LP - Blue Monday and The Beach just....don't. They're a separate, perfect artefact.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Friday, 13 October 2006 08:04 (nineteen years ago)

Alice, two days ago, singing merrily along to the advert.. "How.. does it feel.."

Did anybody take the time to work out the messages via the colour chart?

mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 13 October 2006 08:21 (nineteen years ago)

[As an aside, they did 'These Days' earlier this week at Bournemouth!]

What was that?

Baaderonixx in the year of the locusts (baaderonixx), Friday, 13 October 2006 08:52 (nineteen years ago)

They played the JD song 'These Days' this week at Bournemouth.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Friday, 13 October 2006 10:05 (nineteen years ago)

Did anybody take the time to work out the messages via the colour chart?

*raises hand sheepishly*

zebedee (zebedee), Friday, 13 October 2006 10:28 (nineteen years ago)

Of course!

Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 13 October 2006 10:29 (nineteen years ago)

"They're a separate, perfect artefact."

exactly.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 13 October 2006 13:44 (nineteen years ago)

Listened to this last night after reading this thread, and it's definitely one of my fave NO albums FWIW, for the spare sound and restrained Barney vocals, as well as the great artwork.

It came as a surprise to hear the record as someone who had come to NO via two different routes, their pop hit singles and Joy Division, to hear this band that was neither maximalist synthpop nor gloomy proto-goth punk (reductionist, I know), but a point somewhere in between that managed to meld the two to really startling effect.

Neil Stewart (Neil Stewart), Friday, 13 October 2006 14:01 (nineteen years ago)

The mix is warm, almost pastoral. It's their best self-production.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 13 October 2006 14:02 (nineteen years ago)

I haven't listened to this in years. On release I remember being put off by some of the amazingly trite lyrics ("our love is like the flowers, the rain, the sea and the hours" or however it goes... couldn't he have done better than this? Even the cod-Curtis of Movement is better). Nowadays I guess I don't care so much about lyrics. Especially when the music is as great as it is on tracks like Age Of Consent. I think this would be my favourite NO album after Movement.

Revivalist (Revivalist), Friday, 13 October 2006 14:04 (nineteen years ago)

i could murded a Mars bar now

Britain's Obtusest Shepherd (Alan), Friday, 13 October 2006 14:09 (nineteen years ago)

I too had the cassette and used to listen to it AT the beach (perfect hearing water sounds while you're walking at waves edge. I liked the track "Esctasy" because the only vocals are barely audible vocoder bits.

Paul (scifisoul), Friday, 13 October 2006 14:19 (nineteen years ago)

You mean "Ultraviolence"

Ecstasy was a different album.

mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 13 October 2006 14:44 (nineteen years ago)

Actually Ultraviolence and Ecstasy are both on this album.

Scott Warner (thream), Friday, 13 October 2006 15:46 (nineteen years ago)

no one's yet talked about the brilliance of "Leave Me Alone"? :O

"you get these words wrong...i just smile."

it's a microcosmic insight into the band entire. ;)

quite seriously, though, i think this album is rather uneven but what i enjoy, i enjoy greatly.

KW1 is better live though. :)

janni (janni), Friday, 13 October 2006 22:57 (nineteen years ago)

ah right, Ecstacy = only the lonely...

mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 13 October 2006 23:23 (nineteen years ago)

I first bought the album because the girl at the Licorize Pizza store (oh, my knees) at the Santa Monica Mall told me this is how I could get the "How Does It Feel" song.. so I got it, and it wasn't on there ("Blue Monday" that is) and I was PISSED. So I went back, complained, and they gave me a free copy of the Blue Monday 12" that they didn't put out in the shelves in the first place.

Eventually I'm glad I got both.

And this is the first album I ever bought that didn't only NOT have the band's photo on it, but didn't even have their name or album title on the cover either. It was just this stilllife painting with a bunch of weird symbols on the side. I would have no idea what New Order looked like until Low-Life came out, which gave it away.

0xDOX0RNUTX0RX0RSDABITFIELDXOR^0xDEADBEEFDEADBEEF00001 (donut), Friday, 13 October 2006 23:26 (nineteen years ago)

Even when I was 10 or 11 years old, I was your typical prick music store customer. DO NOT FRONT.

0xDOX0RNUTX0RX0RSDABITFIELDXOR^0xDEADBEEFDEADBEEF00001 (donut), Friday, 13 October 2006 23:28 (nineteen years ago)

My copy of this album still has a very small streak of my blood from a minor car crash in 1983.

I have never heard the CD version.

I like it for all the above reasons, and also for the strumalicious guitar solo in "Age Of Consent".

sleeve version 2.0 (sleeve testing), Friday, 13 October 2006 23:45 (nineteen years ago)

this is my favorite new order album because of its irreverence/melancholy/insouciance. a lot of new order's output is like this, but not as loose and also well-formed. i haven't heard it in a very long time because i played it like crazy when i was . couldn't imagine it without "blue monday" or "the beach". in the early 80s they were pretty much untouchable.

josh. (disco stu), Saturday, 14 October 2006 02:35 (nineteen years ago)

hahaha. the second to last sentence should read:

i haven't heard it in a very long time because i played it like crazy when i was [insert phil's story here].

josh. (disco stu), Saturday, 14 October 2006 02:36 (nineteen years ago)

I liked the track "Esctasy" because the only vocals are barely audible vocoder bits.

aw man "Ecstasy" totally became my fan fave on this album. it feels so dreamy and woozy but still kinda sharp and it's great.

boney james and the shondells (teenagequiet), Tuesday, 17 October 2006 01:32 (nineteen years ago)

"Age Of Consent" is the greatest single they never released.

ah but it was! sort of! OK, not really, but when I went record shopping at Vince Aletti's house I picked up an orange New Order EP that came out just before Regret I think that featured Age of Consent along w/ Bizarre Love Triangle, Blue Monday, Perfect Kiss and one or two more. A tidy DJ tool.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Tuesday, 17 October 2006 01:55 (nineteen years ago)

Dan! I finally heard the Subculture 12". I thought it sucked. Maybe the backup singers were an "idea" at the time but it just pales next to the original.

Jay Vee's Return (Manon_69), Tuesday, 17 October 2006 04:04 (nineteen years ago)

it may be because Substance was my introduction to New Order. (actually got Joy Division Substance first!) I love those back-up singers.

btw, off-topic and all but...live electronic music at Dazzle Ships this wed:
http://www.tropicalcomputersystem.com/

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Tuesday, 17 October 2006 04:22 (nineteen years ago)

Good god, thank goodness ILM is up again. Where the hell you guys been in my life for real? A whole weekend without ILM. It was not pretty.

Bassment Jacks (Bimble...), Tuesday, 17 October 2006 04:31 (nineteen years ago)

( xpost ) Working a night job is rough for those who would like to attend such events. I'll try and sneak outta here early!

On topic: P, C & L was the first commercial "clear" cassette I ever bought. For those of you not of the Pleistocene Era: cassettes used to be solid colors or white. I remember thinking the transparent casing was part of the package design!

Jay Vee's Return (Manon_69), Tuesday, 17 October 2006 05:32 (nineteen years ago)

Goodness, am I alone in the world in that when I bought PC&L when it came out, on the back of hearing Blue Monday, I found it quite disappointing? I was soo hoping for a whole album of that fresh, hard-edged driving sound. I just thought NO had bottled it. Good job techno and the rest was just round the corner I suppose. Having said that, I must listen to it again...

*ducks*

lexurian (lexurian), Tuesday, 17 October 2006 08:23 (nineteen years ago)

actually, that wasn't really telling you why I like it was it? Sorry.

lexurian (lexurian), Tuesday, 17 October 2006 08:26 (nineteen years ago)

Dan! I finally heard the Subculture 12". I thought it sucked. Maybe the backup singers were an "idea" at the time but it just pales next to the original.
-- Jay Vee's Return (milkis...) (webmail), Today 5:04 AM. (later) (link)

especially as it bore no relation to the single version.

Many years later, I discovered a 7" single version was released. Got one.

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 17 October 2006 08:28 (nineteen years ago)

but when i got "power corruption and lies," somehow it felt like i was reaching back into the distant past; somehow i was very aware that i was hearing the document of a band that didn't exist (like that) any more. why was that? it was only three years since "power, corruption and lies" had come out...as i sunk deeper into goth/new wave stuff, 1981-83 was generally my favorite period, and somehow it seemed so far away, like i was terribly inauthentic to be this kid from portland, oregon who only discovered the music through, like, "head on the door" in 1985.

Really speaking my language here, Philip. I'm not sure it's a topic I've heard discussed before but I too recall buying PCL (along with Movement) well after the fact, sometime in early '85. I knew Blue Monday first, YSF, and Temptation, but that's all I knew when I got these records and it was really pretty confusing, even difficult at first to appreciate all the twists and turns of the terrain, especially Movement. I had that same feeling you describe of looking deeply into the past of this group, really not understanding how they got from point A to Z in so short a time. And as time has gone by, I too share your regret that I just didn't find out about this '80-'83 stuff until 1985. It boggles my mind that I was eating up all the crap in the Top 40 circa '80-'83 when all I wanted or needed was someone to come along and let me know there was something else out there.

Bassment Jacks (Bimble...), Tuesday, 17 October 2006 16:38 (nineteen years ago)

thirteen years pass...

This is fantastic. Never heard it before today.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4cUAVTPz8Y

SQUIRREL MEAT!! (Capitaine Jay Vee), Friday, 2 October 2020 20:03 (five years ago)

https://youtu.be/zx0ZoDYYI_o

The 1982 version of Blue Monday is also immense

I am using your worlds, Friday, 2 October 2020 20:42 (five years ago)

one month passes...

The extras CD on this boxset is great. Love all the instrumental work-in-progress versions of the songs. Honestly kind of prefer them that way.

Position Position, Tuesday, 3 November 2020 14:26 (five years ago)

And it's on spotify

Mark G, Wednesday, 4 November 2020 07:54 (five years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.