Is it just me, or does that simple 10-year chronological listing piss all over any and all of Pulp's peers in terms of pop suss, musical innovation, wit, and...uhhhh, everything, ever?
It always pisses me off when singles compilations are sequenced in reverse order, or (worse still) in no order at all - how do y'all think this official record of (ahem) "UK pop's greatest lightly-soiled pop heroes since Squeeze" will be received? Knee-jerk stocking-filler destined for post-Xmas obscurity or one of those canonised classics like, say, Divine Madness or Legend?
― Charlie (Charlie), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 00:43 (twenty-three years ago)
― Charlie (Charlie), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 00:45 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ian, Tuesday, 8 October 2002 00:47 (twenty-three years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 00:48 (twenty-three years ago)
― Wyndham Earl, Tuesday, 8 October 2002 01:03 (twenty-three years ago)
― Charlie (Charlie), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 01:12 (twenty-three years ago)
Actually, the first Stone Roses LP is probably the best Brit-pop singles disc evah!
― Dan-O, Tuesday, 8 October 2002 01:12 (twenty-three years ago)
― Steph (Steph), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 01:50 (twenty-three years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 01:55 (twenty-three years ago)
― Mary (Mary), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 04:30 (twenty-three years ago)
― Nate Patrin, Tuesday, 8 October 2002 04:38 (twenty-three years ago)
Oh no!! Does this signal the end of Pulp?
Pulponline.com had this to say: "The End of Pulp? There's a lot of talk about an imminent Pulp split in the press at the moment, what with them leaving Island and all, and it's clear that there is a lot of confusion over what's really going on. To put you straight: Pulp aren't technically splitting up, but neither are they making any plans to return to the studio (other than for the new extra tracks on the Best Of, already recorded) for the foreseeable future."
Clear as mud, then...my insiders at Universal reckon it's all over tho...grrr...still, rather that than bumble along for ten superfluous years for want of any better ideas *cough*The Cure*cough*...
― Charlie (Charlie), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 05:01 (twenty-three years ago)
― edward o (edwardo), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 06:43 (twenty-three years ago)
― Charlie (Charlie), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 06:55 (twenty-three years ago)
― edward o (edwardo), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 07:04 (twenty-three years ago)
― alexfack, Tuesday, 8 October 2002 09:21 (twenty-three years ago)
― piscesboy, Tuesday, 8 October 2002 10:33 (twenty-three years ago)
― TMFTML (TMFTML), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 13:29 (twenty-three years ago)
― robin carmody (robin carmody), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 17:40 (twenty-three years ago)
The "Countdown" comp already rounded up their early singles etc. This comp is prob supposed to start where that one left off. The track-listing is mega, looks like a great album.
One suggestion: put "Acrylic Afternoon" on instead of "Help the Aged"
― weasel diesel (K1l14n), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 19:53 (twenty-three years ago)
― Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 20:50 (twenty-three years ago)
http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2002461659,00.html
Fantastic headline too!
― Charlie (Charlie), Tuesday, 8 October 2002 22:06 (twenty-three years ago)
It's not the best singles comp of all time. Where is Mis-Shapes etc etc
― Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 09:17 (twenty-three years ago)
― Marcello Carlin, Wednesday, 9 October 2002 09:34 (twenty-three years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 14:53 (twenty-three years ago)
― Mary (Mary), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 23:58 (twenty-three years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 10 October 2002 00:27 (twenty-three years ago)
― Mary (Mary), Thursday, 10 October 2002 01:59 (twenty-three years ago)
― Mary (Mary), Thursday, 10 October 2002 02:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 10 October 2002 10:56 (twenty-three years ago)
― Marcello Carlin, Thursday, 10 October 2002 11:14 (twenty-three years ago)
― g (graysonlane), Thursday, 10 October 2002 14:42 (twenty-three years ago)
― g (graysonlane), Thursday, 10 October 2002 14:46 (twenty-three years ago)
nice one; someone please tell this to Morrissey...
― Mary (Mary), Thursday, 10 October 2002 19:18 (twenty-three years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 11 October 2002 09:37 (twenty-three years ago)
A second volume could have OU, Mis-Shapes, Pink Glove, Acrylic Afternoons, FEELING CALLED LOVE, Monday Morning, His 'n' Hers, Happy Endings, She's A Lady, I Spy, Joyriders, Live Bed Show, Pencil Skirt, Stacks/Inside Susan/59 Lyndhurst Grove - that would be better than most Best Ofs ever.
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 12 October 2002 10:48 (twenty-three years ago)
From the Rough Trade shop website:
Hits is a compilation album by Artist Name featuring some of their most popular songs. The album includes tracks such as "Song Title 1," "Song Title 2," and "Song Title 3."
This album showcases the best of Artist Name and is a must-have for fans of their music. Whether you're a longtime fan or new to their music, Hits is a great addition to any music collection.
― Mark G, Monday, 25 August 2025 10:28 (nine months ago)