― MarkH (MarkH), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 10:27 (twenty-three years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 10:29 (twenty-three years ago)
― Marcello Carlin, Wednesday, 9 October 2002 10:30 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 10:36 (twenty-three years ago)
― David Gunnip, Wednesday, 9 October 2002 10:40 (twenty-three years ago)
― Marcello Carlin, Wednesday, 9 October 2002 11:00 (twenty-three years ago)
coincidentally, Mark Knopfler has a new album out (shudder)
― blueski, Wednesday, 9 October 2002 11:02 (twenty-three years ago)
― tacit (tacit), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 11:03 (twenty-three years ago)
― michael wells (michael w.), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 11:05 (twenty-three years ago)
― Marcello Carlin, Wednesday, 9 October 2002 11:15 (twenty-three years ago)
― alex in mainhattan (alex63), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 11:22 (twenty-three years ago)
in the first half of the 90s it looked like it would be Simply Red
by the end of the 90s the equiv. in fact turned out to be Celine Dion
― zebedeez, Wednesday, 9 October 2002 11:23 (twenty-three years ago)
― Jonathan Williams (ex machina), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 11:32 (twenty-three years ago)
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 11:47 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 11:48 (twenty-three years ago)
― Graham (graham), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 11:51 (twenty-three years ago)
― Jonathan Williams (ex machina), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 11:52 (twenty-three years ago)
It would be tempting to say Paul Weller was the '90's Mark Knopfler were in not for the fact that he's very clearly the '90's Eric Clapton.
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 12:01 (twenty-three years ago)
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 12:11 (twenty-three years ago)
― Jason Weaver, Wednesday, 9 October 2002 12:33 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 12:45 (twenty-three years ago)
― Jonathan Williams (ex machina), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 12:48 (twenty-three years ago)
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 12:52 (twenty-three years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 12:53 (twenty-three years ago)
― stevo (stevo), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 12:54 (twenty-three years ago)
― dleone (dleone), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 12:55 (twenty-three years ago)
Are baggie and Britpop the cultural shifts to which you refer? So that ppl of an age-group and social setting who would previously had been into bands like Dire Straits would listen to indie (in a broad sense) instead?
― MarkH (MarkH), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 13:05 (twenty-three years ago)
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 13:06 (twenty-three years ago)
That's why all these kind of questions are much harder to answer than the 'oh, just pick the latest 12 CD-owning person's fave' answers tend to take them.
― N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 13:11 (twenty-three years ago)
― Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 13:16 (twenty-three years ago)
I like Dire Straits.
― the pinefox, Wednesday, 9 October 2002 13:22 (twenty-three years ago)
― sf, Wednesday, 9 October 2002 13:25 (twenty-three years ago)
I don't believe so. As I recall, people who were into Dire Straits in the '80's weren't really into any particular musical scene, they just wanted something that was current enough to make them look interesting without being either demanding or threatening - the aural equivalent of one of those nice shiny books that they liked to display on their Habitat coffee tables but had no intention of ever actually reading reading.
Their slightly racier younger brothers were generally into Level 42.
Oasis are bland enough in content but FAR too likely to do or say something embarrasing.
I think this means that we need to think of the music that is currently being listened to by the sort of people whose slightly racier younger brothers are currently into Robbie Williams.
Oh and could Norah Jones possibly be the new Sade?
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 13:25 (twenty-three years ago)
― Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 13:31 (twenty-three years ago)
I'd say if Nirvana had lasted longer, esp. further developing the Unplugged sound, it would have been them.
― alex in mainhattan (alex63), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 13:45 (twenty-three years ago)
Them much as I love his earlier stuff, it's gotta be David Gray.
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 14:19 (twenty-three years ago)
― Marcel Post (Marcel Post), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 14:37 (twenty-three years ago)
― Jason Weaver, Wednesday, 9 October 2002 14:39 (twenty-three years ago)
― Jason Weaver, Wednesday, 9 October 2002 14:42 (twenty-three years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 14:46 (twenty-three years ago)
― alex in mainhattan (alex63), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 14:48 (twenty-three years ago)
I agree with this whole-heartedly. I was talking to my dad about Knopfler the other night (he and I both love the self-titled album and "Wild West End" in particular), and my father proposed that Knopfler was one of maybe 10 guitarists around today whose style is so distinctive that you could tell it was him within a few notes. And I had to agree.
Also, don't forget his albums with Chet Atkins. Neck and Neck is fantastic.
That said, I have no idea who to nominate for the modern Dire Straits. Because the popular rock bands of the past decade have all been so dour... Dire Straits was always so upbeat, which was largely the point, I thought. Maybe the Black Crowes? You have the quarelling sibling there too, you know.
― Yancey (ystrickler), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 15:20 (twenty-three years ago)
― Kris (aqueduct), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 15:46 (twenty-three years ago)
― alex in mainhattan (alex63), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 15:55 (twenty-three years ago)
― Kris (aqueduct), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 16:13 (twenty-three years ago)
Noughties looks disturbingly like being Nickelback.
― Mr Swygart (mrswygart), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 17:14 (twenty-three years ago)
― robin carmody (robin carmody), Wednesday, 9 October 2002 18:52 (twenty-three years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 10 October 2002 11:34 (twenty-three years ago)
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Thursday, 10 October 2002 11:47 (twenty-three years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 10 October 2002 11:55 (twenty-three years ago)
I think Quench actually knocked Fatboy Slim's You've Come a Long Way off the number one spot when it came out (hoho).
I don't think you can have a Dire Straits these days: You'd have to convince a the majority of people that good guitaring was a selling point. The world has moved on (or round)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 10 October 2002 14:38 (twenty-three years ago)
Haha, meet the new boss, same as the old boss- 00's equivalent of good guitaring = "he's got a good flow". So what we need basically is a "safe" inoffensive rapper with mad rhyming skillz- I nominate J-Live (NB: I like J-Live. And Dire Straits.)
Are Manic Street Preachers the '90's Genesis?
No, they're the 90's The Alarm.
Are Radiohead the '90's Pink Floyd?
Probably ("OK Computer" certainly is the 90's equivalent of "The Wall"), but they lack a Syd Barret.
As fer Pearl Jam, The Black Crowes and Nickleback- their audiences are/were mainly young people (never seen a copy of "Ten" or "Silver Side Up" lying around in any of my yuppie relative's houses) and American (never met an European over 35 years old that even knows who Pearl Jam *are*!) Thus they do not qualify.
― Daniel_Rf, Thursday, 10 October 2002 21:57 (twenty-three years ago)
(That said, I like Dire Straits and hate DMB.)
― Jody Beth Rosen, Thursday, 10 October 2002 22:58 (twenty-three years ago)
― Daniel_Rf, Thursday, 10 October 2002 23:23 (twenty-three years ago)
Probably ("OK Computer" certainly is the 90's equivalent of "The Wall"), but they lack a Syd Barret."
If OK Computer is the '90's equivalent of The Wall, is Automatic For The People the 90's equivalent of Dark Side Of The Moon?
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 11 October 2002 07:15 (twenty-three years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 11 October 2002 09:34 (twenty-three years ago)
No, that's "Blue Lines"
― Daniel_Rf, Friday, 11 October 2002 13:08 (twenty-three years ago)
― robin carmody (robin carmody), Saturday, 12 October 2002 04:20 (twenty-three years ago)
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Thursday, 2 June 2005 17:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Thursday, 2 June 2005 18:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Thursday, 2 June 2005 18:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sundar (sundar), Thursday, 2 June 2005 18:12 (twenty-one years ago)
i think the rem examples upthread are interestingly, because well they sound a lot like the feelies at least through their first few albums. what distinguishes them is their undoubted (i hope) ability to put that sound into varying and exciting pop contexts, and lyrics that while they may not always MEAN so aggressively, at least have a real sort of poetic form to them. that doesn't mean you have to like r.e.m., but i think the stakes are sort of higher with them than with d.s. (except for those who find d.s.'s lyrics and form stimulating, something that confuses me) or with the feelies (who i like).
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Thursday, 2 June 2005 18:14 (twenty-one years ago)
Communique is particularly good... I like almost everything on that one.
― KeefW (kmw), Thursday, 2 June 2005 18:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Thursday, 2 June 2005 18:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― KeefW (kmw), Thursday, 2 June 2005 18:21 (twenty-one years ago)