I Have Forty-Four Minutes To Explain Why You Will Be Going Out And Buying "Hate" On Monday

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Assuming you're in the UK.

Right. I have written six different reviews of this album now, four of which have been junked, one of which was done in the uni paper this week and was fucking shit, and the other one which was sent to CTCL and hopefully comes out next issue (though the fact that the entire contents of the email were 'thanks will' does worry me a little bit - not saying that I was expecting lavish flowing praise or... arrgh...). It was about 400 words, so if it does come out, it will hopefully have a nice wee picture next to it... cos that review's shit as well.

I've been having a fucking nightmare with my writing lately. I sent Tom an article on Ballboy (to all three of his email addresses), only to realise that it was in fact just me slagging off Radiohead for a while in really quite unreasonable terms without doing a great deal of explaining why I liked Ballboy at all. Then there were my various CTCL bits, the first two of which are in the current issue - a Gemma Hayes review which ain't that bad, but is about Gemma Hayes and is hugely praiseworthy and thus probably doesn't actually fit in CTCL that well (though if any of its writers like her at all, do please let me know), and then one of Angelica, which was a real bastard because it involved me slagging off my mates after about three rewrites and even then it had to be insanely re-edited by someone at CTCL and it ended up looking an awful lot better than the one I submitted, which sort of annoyed me a little but with myself rather than any of CTCL's editors. Except I have this horrendous feeling I may have given Tim Footman the impression that it was the other way round, which needless to say may have pissed him off quite a bit. Then there's the four other reviews I wrote for the next issue, most of which I ain't too pleased with - I slagged off the Noonday Underground rather too harshly, talked utter bollocks about Marah (though not in a negative fashion, it just reads like pish), and showed absolutely no idea of what the Leaf label sampler was meant to be about. Got Mr Scruff about right though, in that it was cack.

Why am I saying this? I need closure on The Delgados. I badly, badly, badly need closure on The Delgados. From what I've splurged so far, you may be wondering why it is I'm writing at all. I need to. Some thick cunt told me I was good at this once, and I pursued it. I've still never managed to quite convince myself they were right, to be perfectly honest. I mean, how many fucking adverbs do I use? Hugh Grant but less likeable... fuck... but music. I need to tell people. I need to convince people. I want them to feel what I feel about this record. I want them to understand. I want to say more than 'it's really, really, really good' (Fact: If you say 'really' enough times then people do believe you). Everyone I know thinks I'm a really sarcastic, cynical person, and this year I'm trying to change that, so I've gone into this mode of hyper-liking, which effectively means that I spout even more vacuous shit than I used to and people no longer just find themselves bored by me, they now find themselves frightened as well.

But I want them to know. And I can tell, I can just fucking tell, there's gonna be people out there who won't care about this, who will already have done their ignoring and moved on.

But I Want Them To Know.

Can I just put my feelings down here? No. There's got to be artifice, construction, fucking 'cleverness' in there. Something to make people think 'Hey, he's smooove'.

OH God.

And this album does not hurt me. This album does not hurt like Angelica hurt, the knowledge that there was definitely a lot of flaky things about it, the possibility that their new proto-feminism (probably there before, but even stronger now) was all some kind of facade, that my mates were right and it was shit. This album does not hurt like Gemma Hayes, knowing that the fact that a) it's on Source Records b) Jo Whiley likes it c) she says the same thing in every interview d) that thing being about how she wants to different e) her being produced by Dave "Hmmm... yeah, more strings should do it" Fridmann - would guarantee blanket 'liking' in the press and total ignominy everywhere else, but being able to see that there is talent there, that she has got a good voice, that some of her songs are rather good, but at the same time that that was almost certain to go screaming down the shitter because of the outside factors, and also with a bit of the blame on her for being happy to get sold to mediocrity.

This album has not got that. There is no question. This is a fantastic record.

And I've only got eight fucking minutes left and some cunt upstairs is jumping up and down.

The feelings aren't unfamiliar. Back before I went to uni and started my music writing, which complicates listening a touch, I was at school and was dead fucking skint all the time by virtue of not being able to afford to have much money off my parents. Fuck, I'm gonna start moaning about my youth... in a nutshell, I was always skint and I never went out, but I had a copy of The Great Eastern. And the first time I heard it, I got similar feelings to this. For many, many months, it was the best album ever. Then I spotted some people saying it was too prog. Take away the strings, and you're not really left with very much. Worse, they all fucking slagged Thirteen Gliding Principles, and I LOVED Thirteen Gliding Principles. I could leap around the living room like a goon flailing away at it (air guitar), I knew every single word (almost never happens only previous occasion was The Boy With The Arab Strap. Fuck. You. Regularly used to time my walk to school to perfection so I'd hear Chickfactor).

ANd I'm out of time, and I've not even said anything about the album. Sweet shit... I'll finish this tomorrow. Really, I will. I need to finish this one.

Mr Swygart (mrswygart), Friday, 11 October 2002 23:59 (twenty-three years ago)

You have the whole weekend to explain to us.

Sorry for no feedback on the Ballboy article!

Tom (Groke), Saturday, 12 October 2002 00:02 (twenty-three years ago)

I've never wanted to hear an album before just on the strength of song titles - but I really want to hear this just because it has a song called "All You Need Is Hate" on it and another called "Child Killer". "Coming In From The Cold" I've heard and liked, is the rest of it as good as that?

edward o (edwardo), Saturday, 12 October 2002 01:21 (twenty-three years ago)

sorry if i havent been quite on top of the emailing duties. the delgados review is going in but had to butchered slightly purely for reasons of length (my fault for commissioning, not yours for writing). i still havent heard the album yet, for some reason beggars are happy to supply ctcl's writers with cds but not its albums editor. for what its worth, i like gemma hayes, kinda, as does everett, but she isnt really ct property.

david mc, Saturday, 12 October 2002 03:52 (twenty-three years ago)

but I really want to hear this just because it has a song called...

Great song titles aren't always an indicator of great songs. Take -dis's The Historically Troubled Third Album for example. Just the album title alone is enough to make you pick it up and give it a quick once-over. Then you'll see songs like "You May Get All The Ladies But I Got My Shit Together," "Do All The Good Ones Have Muslim Names?," and "Please Stop Blaming Your Personal Problems On Films" and think it's something you need to hear. But you couldn't be more WRONG. -dis may or may not have been a great band at one point, but they laid down flat for Steve Albini and let him ruin it all.

paul cox (paul cox), Saturday, 12 October 2002 04:41 (twenty-three years ago)

Great song titles aren't always an indicator of great songs

Normally, I'd agree with you - but I just can't believe that this album is going to be bad. If I don't at least love those two tracks, I'm going to be very surprised.

edward o (edwardo), Saturday, 12 October 2002 05:05 (twenty-three years ago)

Normally, I'd agree with you - but I just can't believe that this album is going to be bad. If I don't at least love those two tracks, I'm going to be very surprised.

You will love All You Need Is Hate. It's perfect.

gazuga (gazuga), Saturday, 12 October 2002 06:01 (twenty-three years ago)

All You Need Is Hate is a great song. It was actually your review that inspired me to listen to it - and play it on the radio show - so thanks.

Jerry (Jerry), Saturday, 12 October 2002 09:27 (twenty-three years ago)

Ah, god bless yiz William.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Saturday, 12 October 2002 10:14 (twenty-three years ago)

Right. Grr. Sorry, was getting insanely pissed off for finding myself spending twelve fucking hours in uni radio yet a bloody gain...

The album opener is The Light Before We Land. It is great. It is beyond great. It's fucking astounding. You see, there's bands that try for majestic. Embrace, for instance. Coldplay. And, to a certain extent, Mercury Rev. The Dark Is Rising, for instance, is not that bad a song, but that string sweep at the start just feels a bit... dubious. As string sweeps go, it's brilliant, this titanic thing that heaves into view, and hearing it at three in the morning on Radio 2 is certainly an experience to remember, but it feels so horrendously contrived at the same time. That Polyphonic Spree album really rubbed me up the wrong way, the way he just seemed to babble about how 'soon, you'll find the won-durrr' without actually having any of it at all...

But this isn't it. Victoria Segal, as mentioned earlier, reckoned that without the strings The Great Eastern was a big nothing of an album, all fluff and no substance. Anyone says that about Hate is missing the point to such a huge degree...

The Light Before We Land, then. Described elsewhere by me as the best opening song on an album ever. This does not have a string sweep. This has strings gliding in, slowly, subtly, then it's got a choir going 'aaah-ah-ah-aaaah... aaah-ah-ah-aaaah (ah-oh-oh-ah)'. Now, The Delgados' track record with choirs isn't fantastic, considering the godawful tacking on of a kids choir at the end of the single release of No Danger, but this time it works, and it works so well, cos it leads into this huge drum beat - it's sort of biblical, in a way, it feels like when it hits it's parting the waves of this gigantic ocean by virtue of its sheer hugeness...

I'm going Ceefax here. Cripes. Anyway. The Light Before We Land shouldn't be divvied up into component parts, because it's all those bits - the strings, the drums, the choir, and Emma Pollock, on whom more later - and it's so complete. It's an intensely, beautifully extravagant record. Where others settle for polyester and formica, The Light Before We Land is only the finest quality materials, and it glistens, gleams and shimmers in the moonlight. This is the sound of greatness, gliding through the stars, like Homer's dream when he falls asleep at the wheel, but you never wake up to find you've driven through a fence at the other end...

cos what you get at the other end is Hate Is All You Need. While The Light Before We Land is in the running to be the best song The Delgados have ever done, this is the most exciting. This being because this is probably the best shot the Delgados will ever have at being huge. Now, the Delgados don't need to be huge. They've made great records before, and they are going to make great records again. Hey, if they're lucky they may even end up getting shafted by The Mercury Music Prize panel again. But you see so much indie shit getting acclaimed as greatness these days, In My Place, Pounding, Take The Long Road And Walk It, You Got The Style, and the people out there are going to think all guitar music has to be either thick or pretentious... and this song, this song could change all that. It's under three minutes, for a start, but better than that I managed to shoulder-barge it into the playlist for the uni radio station (ahead of the actual single choice, Coming In From The Cold), on the C-list. And it's sprouted wings and taken off. More or less every daytime show has played and loved it, and every time I've heard it my heart has jumped for joy and I have screamed "GET IN!!!" It's that kind of a tune. Another great opening, tinkling quietly as Alun Woodward sings over the top of it, no longer the moody shoegazer, now confident and right on top of his game, AND THEN THE CHORUS - "Hate is everywhere, come on people feel it like you just don't care... on your way to school, work or church you'll find that it's the only rule - you ask me what you need - Hate is all you need." The Dels go glam, and they pull it off like you'd never believe. Pray to fuck they have the sense to make this the next single. It has been two years since the last time I listened to the top 40 purposely to see where a new single would enter the charts. That was Black Box Recorder's The Facts Of Life, and from what I can remember I taped it and I should still have it - "A new entry at number 20..." Shame it was Scott Mills presenting it, but fuck it. I wanna do it again. And it's this, it's Hate Is All You Need. It's magnificent.

Anything following those two has a job on its hands. Woke From Dreaming is the poor wee lamb that has to do it, and it doesn't quite, but it gets bloody close. It's them going back to being understated, and in the right state of mind it's quite hypnotic, "You can do what you want if you are that way inclined". It's Emma Pollock again, and as such it's understated and dreamy in a really great but also quite sinister way. Also worth noting the last line is 'We will kill if we have to.' It could only ever pale in comparison to the previous two, but it's still more than capable of kicking Coldplay and Athlete's arses with both hands tied behind its back.

But what comes next is yet another song that is close to being their best ever, The Drowning Years. It's pretty much the best one Alun Woodward has ever done, super-ugleh and hard as nails - him and his demons have never been far from each other, and it's this that propels him to new heights here, a huge crasher of a chorus, he yells "Destroy the noises That make up the voices And Get them out of my head - Bring on the screaming And I'll take your demons Now That I'm already dead", being chased through the mansion in his mind by a million invisible ghosts, crash, crash, crash, The Delgados go dark and fantastic.

Coming In From The Cold sticks out like a sore thumb here. It's actually kind of happy, in a way, but something about this just isn't qutie right, it just doesn't feel as good as the rest of the album somehow, and as a first single choice it's deeply baffling. Still blows away most of the stuff on the radio, though, but not as hard as Hate Is All You Need would.

Now you get Child Killers. And it's not what you'd think it is - it's just over the six minute mark, from what I can remember, and it's probably the quietest track on here. It's also a bit gorgeous. Alun Woodward in resigned, mournful mode, and it's very minimal, just restricting themselves to a bit of Hovis trumpet near the end. It works very nicely, thank you.

Track Seven is Favours, and it's Emma Pollock back on form, this time as a doom-laden whirling dervish. You could see it as the follow up to Accused Of Stealing off the Great Eastern, the 'freewheeling' giving way to 'taking orders from bottles of wine' - "Help me to stand, Help me to say, That I don't wanna be here, I don't wanna stay, I'll just stay away". It's great as well - should've been ahead of Coming In From The Cold in the singles pecking order, in any case.

Then it's All Rise, probably the second weakest track off the album, and it's a bit like The Dark Is Rising, oddly enough - verses a bit weak, then huge motherfucker of an orchestral whoomph on the chorus. The Rev'd kill for it, but in this company it's a bit overawed.

Stemaing on towards the end, Never Look At The Sun finds Emma Pollock in her element. One of the most hideously underappreciated singers in modern popular music, she is. Gothic goddess, drunken harlot, evil temptress, hazy sunlit beauty... god, she's gorgeous. Fantastic guitar player too. Though she does have a face like a smacked arse most of the time. Anyhow - five minutes of overdriven evil fury, Pollock is fantastic, possibly bit overlong but outstanding nonetheless.

And the conclusion. So far, Hate has been the best album of the year, but a bad ending track could cock it all up. If This Is A Plan is a fantastic ending track. Alun Woodward has done his three best songs thus far on this album. This is probably his fifth best, but it still kicks so much arse, the chorus containing what feels like the most euphoric "Hallelujah! It's Finally Happening!" in the history of recorded music over the top of every single instrument they've ever used (which is a lot of instruments) as Woodward's vocal tears off into the distance, showing a complete disrespect for time signatures and rhythm and everything... triumph completed. Hallelujah indeed.

I may not have done a great job of explaining here. But, the thing is, this could well be the first album I've ever got expecting great things that has been even better than I thought it would be. No, actually, it is. Seeing it tossed off in the NME with some unthought 8/10 review while they splurge tons on that fucking charity album (AND THEY HAVE A HUGE FUCKING PHOTO OF STARSAILOR CUNT) makes it all that closer to my heart. It's the Delgados sounding so like the Delgados, making the best music of their careers, but knowing that there's going to be even better to some from them... great songs given all the love and affection they deserve.

It my not be all you need. But you need it all the same. This is the greatness. This is the true, proper greatness. For it to be seen as anything else is wrong beyond all comprehension.

Mr Swygart (mrswygart), Saturday, 12 October 2002 15:23 (twenty-three years ago)

ew ew indie

bob zemko (bob), Saturday, 12 October 2002 15:32 (twenty-three years ago)

No. The Delgados. Not same thing.

Mr Swygart (mrswygart), Saturday, 12 October 2002 15:40 (twenty-three years ago)

Assuming you're in the UK

or pre-ordered it on the Interweb!

scott pl. (scott pl.), Saturday, 12 October 2002 15:53 (twenty-three years ago)

but the last three delgados records were dreadfully dull, including their take on soft bulletin/deserters songs which was their last album. there is a new aislers set single out next month though, so all is not lost.

keith (keithmcl), Saturday, 12 October 2002 16:36 (twenty-three years ago)

I like the Delgados. Their songs are overwhelmingly pretty, giving way to moments of outstanding natural beauty. But they inspire no passion in me. They're like the band that I always put on when I go over a friend's house, but never actually buy for my own home.

kate, Saturday, 12 October 2002 18:01 (twenty-three years ago)

Not as good as 'Finisterre'. (7/10 in NME - how do you think I feel?)

DavidM (DavidM), Saturday, 12 October 2002 20:14 (twenty-three years ago)

Your review only works if you are familiar with Delgados already.

It also sounds like an insane rant and although the album is quite good, I fail to see how it deserves so much froth.

sonicred, Sunday, 13 October 2002 15:00 (twenty-three years ago)

They're older, and they're harder and tired and colder. Well, not tired. Hate is perfect and magnificent and pretty much everything that's so brilliant about it is documented in the insane rant above. KUDOS.

alexfack, Monday, 14 October 2002 19:16 (twenty-three years ago)

It's fucking awesome. I've never heard a single Delgados song before hearing Coming In From The Cold and All You Need Is Hate - but those two were more than enough to make me buy it. I love it. And that review totally works for me. I want to go back to the store from which I bought it and tell everyone who comes in to buy this album. I want everyone to know how great it is, but I don't have the words to do it.

edward o (edwardo), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 06:27 (twenty-three years ago)

This review is a phenomenal piece of work. "Hate" was in my "undecided" category (though I liked "The Great Eastern") but thanks to what you've written I will definitely investigate it.

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 15 October 2002 06:38 (twenty-three years ago)

fucking amazing album, fairly inspirational review. insane rant, yes, but pushes the right buttons. if Hate hadn't already been glued into my Cd player for the last 2 months, I'd now be wondering why not. Wondrous album, and a perfect complement to Yoshimi an' all...

Charlie (Charlie), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 06:38 (twenty-three years ago)

and a perfect complement to Yoshimi an' all...

quoting myself, how very tragic...sorry, but i just occurred to me that this phrase might suddenly put certain people off listening to Hate - do not, I repeat DO NOT let this happen!

I think the two albums sit deliciously well together from a Fridman point of view (although you'll know from Dave Fridman - one-trick pony? that I have certain reservations about even that) and offer two sides of a coin I'm always only too happy to find nestling deep in my pocket along with the lint and the half-melted sweets: psyche-whimsy vs hyper-reality, if you will.

What lets Hate down a little are the occasionally gauche lyrics on the part of, uh, the fella (references to "gak" are just WRONG), but really, it's a beauteous thing to behold, cracks an' all.

Charlie (Charlie), Tuesday, 15 October 2002 07:12 (twenty-three years ago)

Yawn

yawn, Tuesday, 15 October 2002 07:38 (twenty-three years ago)

when I first found ILM, I thought one of the most pleasurable things about it was that it was a largely delgados-free zone. This struck me as odd, but appropriate: it almost became the benchmark for me of good taste. I must say however that Mr Swygart's review is excellent, and if the record's only half as good, I'll happily read more delgados chat around here.

zebedee, Tuesday, 15 October 2002 08:07 (twenty-three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.