― Jeff-PTTL (Jeff), Friday, 23 January 2004 20:07 (twenty-two years ago)
Balde Runner, maybe?
― @d@ml (nordicskilla), Friday, 23 January 2004 20:45 (twenty-two years ago)
Over-inflated windbag of a soap opera. Crap film, crap performances, cheeseball story.
Pretty to look at, perhaps impressive at the time, but an embarassment today.
Bring on the slaughter. . .
― BabyBuddha (BabyBuddha), Friday, 23 January 2004 20:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Friday, 23 January 2004 21:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 23 January 2004 23:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― Leee Majors (Leee), Friday, 23 January 2004 23:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Saturday, 24 January 2004 03:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― anthony kyle monday (akmonday), Saturday, 24 January 2004 03:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Saturday, 24 January 2004 07:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― ryan (ryan), Saturday, 24 January 2004 07:12 (twenty-two years ago)
These then are the ones I don't like.
― Leee Majors (Leee), Saturday, 24 January 2004 07:28 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Saturday, 24 January 2004 07:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Saturday, 24 January 2004 07:44 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jeff-PTTL (Jeff), Saturday, 24 January 2004 17:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ernest P. (ernestp), Saturday, 24 January 2004 18:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Saturday, 24 January 2004 18:51 (twenty-two years ago)
I love love love Buster Keaton, but The General always gets cited as his best, when I much prefer a few others over it (Sherlock, Jr. and Steamboat Bill, Jr., any day).
It's been years since I've seen Jules and Jim, but I remember it leaving me kind of...blah. Absolutely loved The 400 Blows, though, and would've expected that one to be rated higher.
Interesting to see Barry Lyndon as the second-highest ranking Kubrick film on the critics' list.
― Ernest P. (ernestp), Saturday, 24 January 2004 18:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― theodore fogelsanger, Saturday, 24 January 2004 20:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― Chuck Tatum (Chuck Tatum), Saturday, 24 January 2004 21:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Sunday, 25 January 2004 01:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Sunday, 25 January 2004 02:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― Leee Majors (Leee), Sunday, 25 January 2004 19:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Sunday, 25 January 2004 19:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Sunday, 25 January 2004 20:35 (twenty-two years ago)
i didn't originally agree with t.j.'s post on "taxi driver," but i'm starting to get swayed, now that i think about it. it's definitely not a "repeat watch" film, because it's like a horror flick in terms of the shock value. i thought scorsese did a good job of creating a creepy, coked-up, sleazy atmosphere (and atmosphere is the key thing that i respond to in a film, creating a world you feel that you're inhabiting), and it captured the essence of the seventies very well. but the contrivances of the film come through strongly on repeat viewings, and the scorsese "grandeur" certainly shows through. however, i never get tired of the final scene, simply because of the desaturation (which i know was not deliberate, but it adds such a sleazy, nightmarish feel & such a sharp aesthetic juxtaposition from the rest of the film that i find it amazing).
― jay blanchard (jay blanchard), Monday, 26 January 2004 02:11 (twenty-two years ago)