Best Movie Theaters?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I only have experience with Houston and Austin.

Surprisingly, considering Austin's reputation as a movie lovers city, there aren't any really good theaters. The Paramount has some history and character i suppose, but it's basically the most uncomfortable movie watching experience you could ever want. And don't even get me stared on Dobie Theater (where I sat through the entire fucking Cremaster Cycle).

Houston, second only to LA in number of theaters i believe, has two great ones. The Angelika downtown (this is my favorite place to see movies) and the River Oaks Landmark (where I believe Wes Anderson used to see movies). Rice University shows cool movies sometimes on a pleasingly large screen, and it's usually so empty that you can make yourself comfortable somehow.

Has comfortable stadium seating spoiled me? (The best art film theaters in Austin all lack stadium seating.)

As you can see, nothing very interesting.

What about your town?

ryan (ryan), Tuesday, 8 June 2004 04:12 (twenty-two years ago)

Dallas' Angelika and Magnolia theatres are incredibly nice - only a few years old, state-of-the-art sound, stadium seating, etc.

I'm always surprised when I look at the Angelika homepage, though- it looks like the Houston theatre has more mainstream films than arthouse (ie Kill Bill Shrek and Harry Potter this week).

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Tuesday, 8 June 2004 04:24 (twenty-two years ago)

i've only been to the village east cinema in new york once, but the theater i saw dogville in was fuckin' SWEET. stadium-style seating is the bessssst.

new york's angelika is nice too if i remember. i've been to the film forum more than any other theater in new york and it's kinda tiny theater-wise but always an enjoyable experience for me.

joseph (joseph), Tuesday, 8 June 2004 06:06 (twenty-two years ago)

the music box theatre in chicago is my favorite.

built in 1929, live organ before most showings, cavernous old room with twinkling stars on the ceiling and an ornate, italian palazzo-style facade up front. it's grand. plus they're always showing the best stuff.

a spectator bird (a spectator bird), Tuesday, 8 June 2004 12:44 (twenty-two years ago)

There's only two really good movie theaters left in Milwaukee: the Oriental, which is a classic old movie palace with live organ and some fabulous "oriental" style decorations on the inside; and the Times, a cozy Depression era neighborhood movie theater which is currently being programmed more or less as the local analog to the Music Box, with a mixture of old classics and newer art films that aren't getting picked up by the Landmark chain (which the Oriental is currently a part of).

There's a few other old movie palaces left that I wish could be used to show movies again: the Paradise, which operated as a revival theater for a while but is now being rented out to a church group; the Modjeska, which is currently being used as a performance space for theater and concerts; and the Avalon, which is unfortunately very close to being remodeled into an office complex. And also there's the Downer, which is currently being operated by Landmark, but has to endure the obscenity of being split into a two-screener so that it can remain profitable enough to stay open. It's Milwaukee's oldest surviving movie theater, and would be pretty nice inside if it weren't for the postage stamp sized screens that it has to contend with.

The Union Theater on the campus of the local branch of the University of Wisconsin has some interesting programming, but the theater itself is no great shakes to look at or be in, really, although it is large enough inside to actually qualify as a functioning movie theater, unlike the Downer. Which reminds me: ryan, is the Rice University Media Center really all that large inside? From what I remember of it during my student days, the screen seemed to be rather surprisingly on the small side, although the programming was generally fairly excellent.

Chris F. (servoret), Tuesday, 8 June 2004 21:23 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh yeah, I didn't include viewing comfort as a criterion in my judgement there, did I? I guess that I prefer atmosphere over comfort, and anyway, I don't like stadium-style seating. It feels wrong, somehow, like theaters that use it aren't proper movie theaters. There aren't any stadium-style theaters in Milwaukee that aren't showing the standard movieplex stuff anyway, which doesn't influence my outlook on it in a positive way. As far as most comfortable viewing goes, in the theaters that I mentioned, the Paradise and the Avalon were definitely the kings from what I remember, with a nice grade to the seating and giant screens. The Oriental is okay, but has a big aisle going up the middle, which is annoying since I prefer to be seated dead center of the screen. And the Times is very cozy, but probably has the seats scrunched up too close to the screen. I usually wind up sitting in the fourth or fifth row and still have to lean back and make myself comfortable somehow. I guess I could sit farther back , but I really like being close to the screen when I watch movies...

Chris F. (servoret), Tuesday, 8 June 2004 21:49 (twenty-two years ago)

>I guess that I prefer atmosphere over comfort

i hate how these are mutually exclusive as movie theatres go. i am exceptionally tall and i love old theatres with cramped seating, so i have never encountered an exception.

a spectator bird (a spectator bird), Tuesday, 8 June 2004 21:55 (twenty-two years ago)

Atmosphere does bother me sometimes at the Angelika/Magnolia - I feel like I should be seeing, say, Coffee & Cigarettes in a small, cramped theater instead of a giant thing with a few hundred empty seats.

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Tuesday, 8 June 2004 22:03 (twenty-two years ago)

I have many great memories of the legendary Senator Theater in Baltimore. Seeing Metropolis and Lawrence of Arabia there back-to-back nights was heaven. Unfortunately, they also tend to get a lot of crap films, but given that they tend to spring for virtually any big-budget blockbuster, that does increase the probability of wanting to go for the experience, but not wanting to see the movie. That all being said, seeing a good blockbuster there is absolutely tops. I can't praise the theater itself highly enough. Next time I visit, I'll definitely try to make a showing there.

In London, I dunno. I don't really like the West End theaters for the most part, b/c they're either tiny and cramped, too expensive, too dirty, or a combination of all three. The NFT is awesome, though, and the films come with program notes - for everything! And the facility is top-notch. It's a bit snooty - you can't bring in any food or drink aside from water, and you can't buy tickets or enter shortly after the film starts. But definitely something every film lover should at least try out once. It's not for everyone, but if you like it, you like it.

Girolamo Savonarola, Wednesday, 9 June 2004 00:42 (twenty-two years ago)

The Castro in SF is good for rundown Deco aesthetics, for crowd participation, and for watching the organ rise. (And what's better than that?)

Ryan, re Austin are you talking about comfort or programming? The Alamo runs good programs, but yeah, it's basically got the atmosphere of a bingo parlor.

Stephen X (Stephen X), Friday, 11 June 2004 00:39 (twenty-one years ago)

... and for watching the organ rise. (And what's better than that?)

The Fargo Theatre also has an organ on hydrolics, or whatevah.

Eric H. (Eric H.), Friday, 11 June 2004 11:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Portland: Movie selection, price, diverse archictecture, great festivals (PDX International, Ann-Arbor, Super-8, Spike & Mike, etc), and beer availability make PDX one of the best film towns in the nation.

Cinema 21, Clinton Street, The Guild, The Hollywood Theatre, Bagdad Theater (haunted!), Cinemagic, Laurelhurst, The Avalon ($1.50), etc.

Los Angeles: Art house/foreign/independent films are few and far between, poor distribution and ridiculous prices make LA a surprisingly bad place to see a movie.

Arclight (audio/visual-phile cinerama dome design almost makes the $14/ticket seem reasonable), Silent Movie Theatre, Cecchi Gori Fine Arts (Beverly Hills), NuArt, Egyptian Theatre (Hollywood, Cinemascope, 70mm, organ, etc.), Grauman's (Mann) Chinese Theatre (Hollywood, "the most famous movie theatre in the world"), New Beverly Cinemas, etc. A lot of the best movie theatres in L.A. have been closed down or converted into music venues or other businesses.

Check out Cinema Treasure's Theater Guide for an amazing database of classic theatres organized by location, style, etc.

Ryan McKay (Ryan McKay), Saturday, 12 June 2004 08:51 (twenty-one years ago)

the grand lake in Oakland is probably the best theater in the East Bay area now. The castro beats everything in SF. If you're going for "big state of the art reclining seats and shit", the Metreon is still alright in SF.

kyle (akmonday), Saturday, 12 June 2004 14:48 (twenty-one years ago)

I like the NuArt a lot.

PVC (peeveecee), Tuesday, 15 June 2004 10:36 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.