the michelle malkin thread

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

moderators:

please delete the first sentence of this thread. i wrote it in a moment of pique. please make it, um, nicer.

― Eisbär (llamasfur), Saturday, 21 August 2004 01:48 (twenty-one years ago)

something like "nasty harpy whose commentary borders on outright defamation and w/ a faulty working knowledge of history"

― Eisbär (llamasfur), Saturday, 21 August 2004 01:53 (twenty-one years ago)

Where is this thread?

― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 21 August 2004 08:05 (twenty-one years ago)

It's a recent 'Defend the Indefensible' on ILE

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 21 August 2004 12:59 (twenty-one years ago)

I think I won't touch it. Our guidelines don't include it, make clear that we aren't changing things just because someone reconsiders, and no one seems terribly disturbed by it. I am unfamiliar with the woman, so I've no idea if it is fair comment or not.

― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 21 August 2004 14:23 (twenty-one years ago)

can you please delete the phrase in my post "Ihave a personal stake in this area." It's a little too personal...

― lovebug starski (lovebug starski), Saturday, 21 August 2004 14:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Whoops, I actually already changed this before I noticed Martin's comment. I thought it was a bit too much over the top, not just a matter of reconsideration but possibly nasty enough to invite lawsuit if seen.

― Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Saturday, 21 August 2004 14:54 (twenty-one years ago)

This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.