simon reynolds reviews 679's grime comp 'run the road' for the observer

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Various Artists: Run The Road

5 stars Simon Reynolds on a collection which proves that grime is US hip hop's true heir
Simon Reynolds
Sunday November 14, 2004

The Observer
Various Artists
Run The Road (679)
£13.99

Grime is our hip hop, the final coming of a Brit rap that's not merely a pale reflection of the original. To American ears reared on 'the real thing', grime sounds disconcertingly wrong - the halting, blurting MC cadences don't flow, the gap-toothed grooves seem half-finished and defective.

But if grime doesn't have a hope in hell with America's hip hop heartland, right now it's got the edge over 'the real thing'. The records sound cheap'n'nasty next to US rap's glossy productions, but grime's way with rhythm and sound is far more jaggedly futuristic. More crucially, grime has a feeling of desperation that American hip hop has largely lost. Individual rappers may still follow rags-to-riches trajectories, but as a collective enterprise, hip hop has won. It dominates pop culture globally. The music oozes a sense of entitlement, something you can also see in that lordly look of blasé disdain that's de rigueur in rap videos nowadays. In America, rising MCs rhyme about the luxury goods and opulent lifestyle they don't yet have because it's also so much more within reach.

As a sound, grime is still very much an underdog, and so its fantasies of triumph and living large are much more precarious and affecting. There's a definite ceiling to how much money can be made on the underground scene. Selling 500 singles is a result, shifting a thousand is a wild success; nobody in grime, not even Dizzee Rascal, has really mapped out a crossover career path yet.

You can hear all this in the music, in those pinched, scrawny voices - the sound of energy squeezing itself through the tiniest gap and grabbing for a chance that no doubt will prove to be a mirage. All of the guys (plus occasional gal) on Run the Road already feel like legends in their own minds. Standout track 'Chosen One' by Riko & Target distils that sense of destiny and destination. Over sampled soundtrack strings, Riko imagines himself as a star on satellite TV, then offers counsel that applies equally to other aspiring MCs and to street soldiers dealing with adversity: 'Stay calm/ Don't switch/ Use composure, blood/Use your head to battle through, cos you are the chosen one.'

American rappers, once they've made it, can sound like bullies and tyrants when they reel out the same old lyrical scenarios: humiliating haters, discarding women like used condoms. From grime MCs, the endless threats and boasts, the big-pimpin' postures, somehow seem more forgivable. When grime MCs batter rivals real and imaginary, they're really battening down their own self-doubt, chasing away the spectre of failure and anonymity with each verbal blow. Sure, the misogyny and gun talk can be hard to stomach, but, though outnumbered 20 to one, the female MCs give as good as their gender usually gets. No Lay, on 'Unorthodox Daughter', promises to 'put you in Bupa' and warns, 'soundboy, I can have your guts for garters/ Turn this place into a lyrical slaughter'.

Possibly the best grime collection yet, Run the Road is also touted as the genre's first major label compilation. Actually, a Warners sub-label released one - Crews Control - in 2002. But its contents were more like proto-grime, the beats mostly two-step and UK garage, and the vibe far more playful and genial, courtesy of now almost forgotten crews like Heartless and Genius. Their brand of boisterous bonhomie and quirky humour is in short supply here. One exception: Lady Sovereign's 'Cha Ching', on which the squeaky-voiced 'white midget' announces, 'It's Ms Sovereign, the titchy t'ing/ Me nah have 50 rings/ But I've got 50 things/ To say/ In a cheeky kind of way/OK?'

If grime ever does makes it, collectively, these past three years of the genre's emergence will be regarded as the golden age. Make no mistake, the MCs on this compilation - Kano, D Double E, Riko, Sovereign, Dizzee, Wiley - are our equivalents of Rakim, Chuck D, Ice Cube, Nas, Jay-Z. To twist slightly the words of another rapper from that American pantheon, Notorious BIG: if you (still) don't know, get to know.

Burn it: 'Chosen One'; 'Cha-Ching'

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Wednesday, 24 November 2004 13:16 (twenty-one years ago)

by the way, i know he doesnt like hip hop but at least get the biggie quote right at the end if youre gonna go on about how grime is the 'real uk hip hop' or whatever.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Wednesday, 24 November 2004 13:27 (twenty-one years ago)

TWIST SLIGHTLY

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Wednesday, 24 November 2004 13:28 (twenty-one years ago)

(cough)

so who's got 679's new grime comp - run the road?

piscesboy, Wednesday, 24 November 2004 13:33 (twenty-one years ago)

"To twist slightly the words of another rapper from that American pantheon, Notorious BIG: if you (still) don't know, get to know."

ok, i didnt read the first part of this sentence properly.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Wednesday, 24 November 2004 13:51 (twenty-one years ago)

With Reynolds continually referencing UK hip hop as being "our" in his think-piece review, isn't there any irony somewhere as I'm sure Reynolds' is American - is he not?

Also, as with every other musical sub-genre that has sprung up in the last 15 years, how is it that Reynolds seems to be the first journo to attempt to capture the first wind of something and champion, whether it good or bad, or not even a genre to start with???

Personally, I think grime is a more tokenist brand than anything before it. Really!... you can go back to many points in UK hip-hop and brand it "grime" (what of Shut Up & Dance, London Posse, Hijack, Cash Crew, etc..etc).

I like to be ahead of the commerical game and strike early in a genre's birth, but, c'mon, grime? Is that the best "you" can do?

herbalizer12 (herbalizer12), Wednesday, 24 November 2004 14:46 (twenty-one years ago)

Reynolds lives in the US with his American wife but is British by birth and lived in the UK until the mid-90s, I believe.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 24 November 2004 14:49 (twenty-one years ago)

er no simon reynolds is from hertfordshire but lives in new york

reynolds maybe the first journalist to use brand it "grime" (and i dont think he is) but that doesnt mean he invented the term! genre names have a life outside of the press, a style of music doesnt need to be validated by an artcile to give it official recognition. the term "grime" came from within the scene and people using it now outside the scene (eg us, journos etc) are doing so because the people making the music and involved started off calling it that. i remember when people moved from garage to "grimey garage", and from then on it just got truncated. its not the best "you" could do, because "you" didnt do it.

ambrose (ambrose), Wednesday, 24 November 2004 14:52 (twenty-one years ago)

whoops xpost

ambrose (ambrose), Wednesday, 24 November 2004 14:52 (twenty-one years ago)

in five posts this thread has become the single worst most inll-informed thread on ilm and that really is saying something quite spectacular.

by the way, i know he doesnt like hip hop

sheer idiocy - read some of the man's work rather than spouting nonsense that you read on the internet. he's actually quite a big fan.

isn't there any irony somewhere as I'm sure Reynolds' is American

no he's not. he's english.

Personally, I think grime is a more tokenist brand than anything before it. Really!... you can go back to many points in UK hip-hop and brand it "grime" (what of Shut Up & Dance, London Posse, Hijack, Cash Crew, etc..etc).

ummm... this is quite mental. it's an important and fertile scene in london and no shut up and dance cannot be labelled as grime. the name has been pretty much accepted and it's a very specific brand of mc-led urban music (not quite hip-hop, not quite garage, not dancehall but with roots in all the above).


stelfox, Wednesday, 24 November 2004 14:55 (twenty-one years ago)

god i hate this board

stelfox, Wednesday, 24 November 2004 14:57 (twenty-one years ago)

SUAD made a few proto-grime tracks (No Doubt) tho, heh heh

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Wednesday, 24 November 2004 15:02 (twenty-one years ago)

Was "Snot Rap" grime?

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Wednesday, 24 November 2004 15:11 (twenty-one years ago)

The Ragga Twins - proto-grime then?

herbalizer12 (herbalizer12), Wednesday, 24 November 2004 15:20 (twenty-one years ago)

i think SUAD can be quite easily linked to grime.

hardcore - SUAD/ragga twins -> jungle -> grime

most grime artists claim jungle and UKG as equal parents to the scene/music.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Wednesday, 24 November 2004 15:23 (twenty-one years ago)

xpost - what i meant was that i dont think reynolds likes UK rap. london posse might be anomalies in the UKHH pantheon but their first album was as original as anything grime has made for it's time.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Wednesday, 24 November 2004 15:25 (twenty-one years ago)

well it helps to say what you mean in the first place, if indeed you did mean that.

stelfox, Wednesday, 24 November 2004 15:27 (twenty-one years ago)

the SUAD link's simpler than that, 'No Doubt' sounds much like '183 Trek'

it was listening to Gunshot's 'Apocalypse Bass' that actually got me thinking 'woah this could almost be now' but perhaps i was just hearing what i wanted to hear (i haven't heard THAT much grime after all)

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Wednesday, 24 November 2004 15:32 (twenty-one years ago)

yes yes yes, of course old hardcore and jungle and ukg are *LINKED* with grime (this is not news) they just can't be referred to *AS* it. please accaept that i am correct. i know it goes against the grain here, but just this once humour me... it's nearly xmas, after all

stelfox, Wednesday, 24 November 2004 15:41 (twenty-one years ago)

you and your crazy 'spherical world' theories

Freelance Hiveminder (blueski), Wednesday, 24 November 2004 15:45 (twenty-one years ago)

This thread = "Why Dissensus Is Necessary" part 379.

Marcello Carlin, Wednesday, 24 November 2004 15:50 (twenty-one years ago)

i feel really bad about saying this, and a bit ashamed, and maybe im just out of the loop or something, but am i the only one slightly underwhelmed by run the road?! i love listening to certain grime tracks, and pirate shows, and even sidewinder cds that ive got copies of, but something about RTR just doesnt seem as exciting as the other stuff ive heard and all the hype would have me believe. i cant be the only one who doesnt love every single thing about grime unreservedly!

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Wednesday, 24 November 2004 15:50 (twenty-one years ago)

Titchy don't think that just because we don't start ten threads about this or that piece of grime which underwhelms us that we're not underwhelmed by any grime tracks or artists. But what's the point of talking incessantly about stuff that isn't so interesting? If I don't like a grime track I pretty much stop listening to it rather than start a crusade about it.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Wednesday, 24 November 2004 22:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Anyone remember Speed Garage, progressive house, artcore, ragga-jungle, 2-step, etc... Grime just doesn't have the staying power to convince itself that it's a worthy genre unto its own!

Sure, it might throw up some classics within the next year (as every sub-genre does) but it is hardly the movement that UK journos like to hype up; especially when you still hear the influence that trip hop, 'Ardkore, breakbeat or early drum'n'bass in tracks even today!

Grime is a cast-off to any urban form before it but, ultimately, it will wither on this never-ending, name-brand vine.

herbalizer12 (herbalizer12), Thursday, 25 November 2004 15:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Anyone remember Speed Garage, progressive house, artcore, ragga-jungle, 2-step, etc... Grime just doesn't have the staying power to convince itself that it's a worthy genre unto its own!

Oh yes it does.

Sure, it might throw up some classics within the next year (as every sub-genre does) but it is hardly the movement that UK journos like to hype up

Oh yes it is.

Grime is a cast-off to any urban form before it but, ultimately, it will wither on this never-ending, name-brand vine.

Oh no it won't.

Have you heard the recent Dizzee record? Have you ears?

Jay Kid (Jay K), Thursday, 25 November 2004 15:09 (twenty-one years ago)

"but it is hardly the movement that UK journos like to hype up"

who gives a shit? stop reading mags and blogs! stop confusing discussion of the music wit hthe music itself!

oh no, its a really short lived genre! that immediately invalidates it! i want it to do, real soon! things that drag on are often (thoughb not always)...a drag! i can fully guarantee (although i have been saying this for a couple of yeasr now) that in 6 months/1 year/3 years time i will be into something else, and although just cos i am into it doesnt signify whether its relevant, what i am saying is dont get so hung up on how long it is going to be around., that isnt a relevant criticism in my mind.

ambrose (ambrose), Thursday, 25 November 2004 15:36 (twenty-one years ago)

Herbalizer12, what musical style "brands" are legitimate in your book?

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Thursday, 25 November 2004 21:52 (twenty-one years ago)

oops "i want it to do" above, obviously doesnt make sense. it should read "i want it to die", although thats a little too strong. what i mean is, i think that it should last past its sell by date, and if that sell by date, like freshly squeezed orange juice or salad in a bag, isnt very far off, then that is no bad thing. like food products, music that is intense, fresh, flavoursome but that wont stay good very long is no bad thing. in fatc i sort of prefer it (thats not to say that jazz, house etc, the jams and preserves of music arent good as well!)

ambrose (ambrose), Thursday, 25 November 2004 22:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Grime is a cuture or a movement more than a sound now. And it's birth and rise has been documented in print for the last three years, it's only recently that 'grime' has begun to find it's home in more mainstream press. But the likes of Simon Reynolds writing this for The Observer is of great value to the scene and indicative of it's worth and future.

Chantelle Fiddy, Sunday, 28 November 2004 00:21 (twenty-one years ago)

"Make no mistake, the MCs on this compilation - Kano, D Double E, Riko, Sovereign, Dizzee, Wiley - are our equivalents of Rakim, Chuck D, Ice Cube, Nas, Jay-Z."

I'm English and never have I pissed my pants as much as reading this junk.

Like UKG and drum and bass before it, a few names from the 'grime' scene (inverted commas because those at the peak of it don't want to claim that as a badge) will go on to more traditional and mainstream friendly things and then the rest with wither away before the next new 'urban' thing comes up.

It's all so tiresome.

Hip-hop changed the world - grime won't even change London.

Link, Sunday, 28 November 2004 14:16 (twenty-one years ago)

It already has changed London. We're living it.

Chantelle Fiddy, Sunday, 28 November 2004 14:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Hip-hop changed the world - grime won't even change London.

Apart from the fact that this isn't actually true, why the fuck should it matter whether grime 'changes the world'? Jesus what a hoary old rockist chestnut. Grime is important to the people who make it, the people who listen to it, all these people living it. That's why it's amazing, not whether the creaky old mainstream rock press picks up on it and sends it stratospheric.

The Lex (The Lex), Sunday, 28 November 2004 14:24 (twenty-one years ago)

i cant be the only one who doesnt love every single thing about grime unreservedly

Who are these people who love every single thing about grime unreservedly? They don't post here, as far as I can tell. We do have our fair share of irritating devil's advocate types without any semblance of a point , though...

adam... (nordicskilla), Sunday, 28 November 2004 16:29 (twenty-one years ago)

changing the world = rockist
changing the game = rappist

Ian Christe (Ian Christe), Sunday, 28 November 2004 17:09 (twenty-one years ago)

change of heart -- lauperist.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Sunday, 28 November 2004 17:25 (twenty-one years ago)

ian christe is so OTM.

DVD (dickvandyke), Sunday, 28 November 2004 18:38 (twenty-one years ago)

"Grime is a cuture or a movement more than a sound now. And it's birth and rise has been documented in print for the last three years, it's only recently that 'grime' has begun to find it's home in more mainstream press. But the likes of Simon Reynolds writing this for The Observer is of great value to the scene and indicative of it's worth and future."

nice neither here nor there pacifist PR there......

DVD (dickvandyke), Sunday, 28 November 2004 18:39 (twenty-one years ago)

"Like UKG and drum and bass before it, a few names from the 'grime' scene (inverted commas because those at the peak of it don't want to claim that as a badge)..."

if youre talking about dizzee, well thats just lame on his part. he just wants to go hip hop anyway and appeal to the hip hop masses so let him. or maybe he just has a diff view of what genres constitute his music.

"....will go on to more traditional and mainstream friendly things and then the rest with wither away before the next new 'urban' thing comes up."

thats silly. drum n bass DID change the world, or the world's concept of rhythm, you can STILL hear its rhythms in millions of other genres and songs. on outkasts last album, andre3000 was THAT recently trying to do something in a D&B rhythm (it was a shit remake of my favourite things but never mind).

and it doesnt matter if grime does or doesnt change the world, whatever that might entail.

DVD (dickvandyke), Sunday, 28 November 2004 18:44 (twenty-one years ago)

the thing is though, that grime has yet to yield a serious 'grime' hit single in the way jungle had original nuttah or even incredible early on in it's development. why is this?

DVD (dickvandyke), Sunday, 28 November 2004 18:46 (twenty-one years ago)

becoz Forward got pushed back

Paul (scifisoul), Sunday, 28 November 2004 18:58 (twenty-one years ago)

nice to see reynolds admit its hip-hop at last... if i could be bothered i'd dig up that blog post where he said something like "it's NOT hip-hop--END OF STORY, PERIOD, FULL STOP"

bugged out, Sunday, 28 November 2004 19:25 (twenty-one years ago)

"It already has changed London. We're living it. "

Changed London? Get off the crack, biditch! Other than a tiny part of some way out area of London (that's probably more accurately Essex), it ain't shit. It's no 'sound of the streets'.

Some people will do anything to jump on a fad. Tsk.

The Game, Sunday, 28 November 2004 19:59 (twenty-one years ago)

well, as far as the its hip hop thing, id say grime on record, for the most part = hip hop. on pirate radio and at raves, no.

DVD (dickvandyke), Sunday, 28 November 2004 20:47 (twenty-one years ago)

fwd riddim isnt going to sell shit in my honest opinion. i hate the way the industry works - records get delayed over and over until theyre ooooooooooooold news.

DVD (dickvandyke), Sunday, 28 November 2004 20:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Amen

Bernard the Butler (Lynskey), Sunday, 28 November 2004 20:56 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah why do think "Pow" will chart really well? i cant see any reason for it to. It might have scraped the top 20 if it had beenm released when there was hype about it, but there isnt even a marketable figure to promote behind it either. (eg its Lethal Bizzles tune, so why are there 20 people mcing on it?!)

ambrose (ambrose), Sunday, 28 November 2004 21:11 (twenty-one years ago)

"But the likes of Simon Reynolds writing this for The Observer is of great value to the scene and indicative of it's worth and future."

i dont like this sort of 'bow down to the big wig establishment' type of thinking. just cos the OMM cover it, why does that make it more important than if B&S, touch, echoes, or RWD cover it? i mean, the mainstream will likely get up on grime then forget about it, just like they always do. just cos theres a lot of hype about it now, theyre all over it, but well see if theyre still into it when the hype dies. jus cos reynolds (no dis to him as a great dance critic at all) is writing about it for a broadsheet, doesnt mean the scene is validated, or rather it doesnt mean grime persons should feel theyre being validated. that type of thinking fucks underground scenes up when they start looking outside for approval.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Sunday, 28 November 2004 21:17 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah but whos looking for approval here? reynolds is writing about grime, and 679 want exposure for thier release, but i think you are projecting motives onto the actual producers and mcs, ie the memebrs of the scene here. Like, wiley seemed to want approval for a bit, or at least some sort of wider recognition, but now he is back on the radio and talking about doign raves and stuff again. People within in the scene want success but that is totally different to approval from the print media etc. if reynolds and the observer want to write about grime, thats fine, but it doesnt mean that the "grime scene" has come to some consensus and agreed "ok lets really push for mainstream approval via the channels of.....the Observer!".

ambrose (ambrose), Sunday, 28 November 2004 21:24 (twenty-one years ago)

haha, no thats not what i meant. i just meant the general attitude that pervades underground music, where people think 'it must be big if the mainstream is on it' or whatever. or rather, where they are more respectful of that sort of coverage than other mags. like when i read shystie was overjoyed at being in the independent, cos there was a time when she would have just been happy to be in rwd.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Sunday, 28 November 2004 21:47 (twenty-one years ago)

am i the only one who thinks pow reminds them of 21 seconds, in that each MC has only a short space to rap in, and theres about a zillion rappers?!

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Sunday, 28 November 2004 21:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes, that's what he's saying. And as an American who finds himself listening to early '90s rap provided on "GTA: San Andreas" for PS2 and thinking, "Damn, that stuff is so much better than current hip-hop," I tend to agree with Reynolds.

Mr Deeds (Mr Deeds), Thursday, 2 December 2004 06:56 (twenty-one years ago)

clearly you either dont live in london or dont read the music press.

I don't live in London, I do read the music press, and have promoted artists outside of London, Tinchy. I was just pointing as to what the actual topic this thread was about before it got dragged off line. And all in all, it isn't that much hype. Not as much hype as Tesco trying to get me to buy a fucking snow patrol album every time I turn on TV, or the amount of wanking-over and peddling about bono and his lads releasing another mediocre album. So? The press are getting a little excited about something that *isn't* major label pushed, and is resulting in people getting contracts and getting signed. Why the fuck aren't they allowed to get a bit excited about this, even if it dies in flames????

3underscore (___), Thursday, 2 December 2004 09:07 (twenty-one years ago)

i dont have the power to stop people getting excited about this, even if i wanted to stop them (which i dont). my point was just that a lot of people, especially those within the media, are going to react to the hype. of course its not on the level of snow patrol - i wouldnt call that hype anyway, thats advertising - but it is still there - you can FEEL it. its no bad thing - i hope RTR sells a million and we get more comps, like we got a decade ago with jungle.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Thursday, 2 December 2004 10:02 (twenty-one years ago)

"also, do people really agree with this?

More crucially, grime has a feeling of desperation that American hip hop has largely lost. Individual rappers may still follow rags-to-riches trajectories, but as a collective enterprise, hip hop has won. It dominates pop culture globally. The music oozes a sense of entitlement, something you can also see in that lordly look of blasé disdain that's de rigueur in rap videos nowadays. In America, rising MCs rhyme about the luxury goods and opulent lifestyle they don't yet have because it's also so much more within reach.

Is Reynolds' saying that "grime" is hungry but "hip-hop" is not? "

yeah, hip hop has lots its hunger. its bloated and fat, with nothing to prove. the south is still incredibly hungry though, just as much as grime artists, possibly more so.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Thursday, 2 December 2004 10:07 (twenty-one years ago)

Someone used the phrase 'politricks'? Lord help us all.

Pikmin, Thursday, 2 December 2004 13:47 (twenty-one years ago)

No pleasing some people...
Of all the DVD's out there I'd recommend Lord of The Decks 2 as well and Practice Hours. Risky Roadz looks set to be a must-have as well. As for the south, the crunk ethos and style is on a par with grime, totally agree. For me hip hop lost it's hunger a while ago. Like Nas was saying on Channel U last night, this decade so far has been one of the worst for hip hop in terms of originality and creativity.

Chantelle Fiddy, Thursday, 2 December 2004 14:10 (twenty-one years ago)

b-b-but surely what makes crunk so good is the way it's SO bloated and fat, and revels in that. That's what I hear in it anyway.

I don't like this hip-hop vs grime trope which seems to be developing. I definitely agree that grime sounds 'hungrier' and more desperate, but this does not necessarily make it superior.

The Lex (The Lex), Thursday, 2 December 2004 14:13 (twenty-one years ago)

We all want grime to sell a million copies... and then we can bitch about how it's not hungry anymore.

bugged out, Thursday, 2 December 2004 14:18 (twenty-one years ago)

Like Nas was saying on Channel U last night, this decade so far has been one of the worst for hip hop in terms of originality and creativity.

he said that on Popworld as well, but i thought he was just talking about himself hyuck hyuck (seriously tho, hip-hop is still creative and exciting but it's not a kid (80s) or teenager (90s) anymore so freshness lost in that respect sure but it's all grown up now - those are the terms i think of it in)

Frankenstein On Ice (blueski), Thursday, 2 December 2004 14:18 (twenty-one years ago)

It's the energy in crunk I find attractive, and it's that same energy I get from grime. I don't think it's about which one is superior, to me it's about what it's saying. They'll be great hip hop tunes and wack ones, same with grime. The hip hop v grime arguement will no doubt continue and become more prevalent because not only is so much of it about the MC but elements of the media want to coin grime the real UK hip hop.

Chantelle Fiddy, Thursday, 2 December 2004 14:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Hmm I get what you're saying re energy but to me it's totally different energy - über-hedonistic, decadent, wild energy vs hungry, desperate, sharp energy. I like 'em both though so it's all good.

Re grime vs hip-hop, I suppose the minor backlash to "Stand Up Tall" ("oh no! Dizzee's sold out and gone hip-hop!") was a bit of an alert.

The Lex (The Lex), Thursday, 2 December 2004 14:50 (twenty-one years ago)

but people said that when he did Fix Up, Look Sharp too

Chantelle Fiddy, Thursday, 2 December 2004 15:00 (twenty-one years ago)

i don't see how anyone could say stand up tall was a hip hop record; fix up, i can understand but not that. and lex do you really think crunk sounds bloated? put it against anything else not from the dirty from the past couple of years and, to me, it sounds quite the opposite: stripped down and bleak, like rusting metal and peeling chrome might sound. these sonic characteristics make me appreciate it in the same way i do grime, which i really can't do with any other kind of hip hop (or even dancehall). incidentally, it's also pretty hungry-sounding - if you listen to a good lump of it in one hit, it's really easy to pick out a running theme, too: appetites, be it for booze, violence or booty.

stelfox, Thursday, 2 December 2004 16:40 (twenty-one years ago)

Crunk sounds massive to me; mainly cos of the vocals, actually, which make even the sparsest production sound maximalist and rowdy (and the vocals are so deliberately dominant as well). (and I don't see how the overall sound is particularly stripped down compared to Missy or Twista or Trina or Snoop.) And appetites, yes, but appetites for more booze'n'booty rather than coming from a position of not having any of it.

listening to Crunk Juice it really is the vocals which I think make me think like this.


The Lex (The Lex), Thursday, 2 December 2004 16:57 (twenty-one years ago)

i don't see how anyone could say stand up tall was a hip hop record

it's taken on the image rather than the sound perhaps. the video is VERY hip-hop. but they're a combined package to some people.

Frankenstein On Ice (blueski), Thursday, 2 December 2004 17:06 (twenty-one years ago)

lex, it's not more minimal per se it's just a lot less frilly, a lot more crunches and wallops and less intricacy than there is in anything by tim, jerkins, the neptunes etc.

stelfox, Thursday, 2 December 2004 17:16 (twenty-one years ago)

I put Crunk Juice on after you posted the first time and I definitely see what you mean. but the key difference for me really is the vocal styles. (to generalise) Lil Jon sounds like he's shouting at strippers, most grime MCs sound like they're holed up in some dank recording studio.

The Lex (The Lex), Thursday, 2 December 2004 17:24 (twenty-one years ago)

stand up tall isnt hip hop. forget the video, its way too fast for regular hip hop.

as for crunk being bloated, i dont get how anyone thinks that, crunk is the freshest thing hip hop has thrown up from the US in ages.

xpost - cant believe nas was on channel u!!!

as for this:

"American rappers, once they've made it, can sound like bullies and tyrants when they reel out the same old lyrical scenarios: humiliating haters, discarding women like used condoms."

showtime was very much in that mould. its not like grime doesnt talk about bitches and haters. it does them in abundance. and half the time, it sounds OTT and forced. they could at least do it with some more conviction. much as i like cock back, they sound a bit ridiculous and cartoonish.

"From grime MCs, the endless threats and boasts, the big-pimpin' postures, somehow seem more forgivable. When grime MCs batter rivals real and imaginary, they're really battening down their own self-doubt, chasing away the spectre of failure and anonymity with each verbal blow."

people used to say this about hip hop - that the boasts and brags were to cover up insecurity. i dont know why its more forgivable here. in a way its worse, cos theyre just apeing american MCs, albeit in a sort of slightly 'british' way.

"Sure, the misogyny and gun talk can be hard to stomach, but, though outnumbered 20 to one, the female MCs give as good as their gender usually gets. No Lay, on 'Unorthodox Daughter', promises to 'put you in Bupa' and warns, 'soundboy, I can have your guts for garters/ Turn this place into a lyrical slaughter'."

hip hop always had female MCs to give the guys what they deserved too - salt n pepa, mc lyte, latifah, etc etc. most female mcs now might just be fantasies for men, but they still do stick it to the men most of the time, albeit mainly or only in the sexual arena.

the grime vs hip hop debate is a bit redundant - hip hop still has a lot of good stuff happening. its shot most of its wad, but stuff like the dirty south still makes it exciting. and when theres MCs like Trife from theodore unit still emerging, it proves theres still life in it. nas' new album also shows rappers still have some balls and arent complete parodies. lets not get carried away with grime's alleged superiority over hip hop, its still in its infancy.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Thursday, 2 December 2004 18:33 (twenty-one years ago)

actually, the grime vs US hip hop grandstanding is not much better than insular brit-hip hop heads claiming how much better UKHH is than US hip hop in the last few years (yes these people do exist). its overstating things, especially as so many grime MCS are so reliant on gangsta hip hop ideologies and concerns from the last ten years or so.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Thursday, 2 December 2004 18:35 (twenty-one years ago)

"its way too fast for regular hip hop"

it uses one of the oldest hip-hop breaks in the book, fule.

Back in the '80s, hip-hop was faster than it is now.

bugged out, Thursday, 2 December 2004 18:42 (twenty-one years ago)

"its way too fast for regular hip hop"

it uses one of the oldest hip-hop breaks in the book, fule."

are you referring to stand up tall or fix up look sharp?

hip hop was ocassionally faster in the 80s, and there were lots of fast records being made, but it kinda lost that around 1994.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Thursday, 2 December 2004 18:47 (twenty-one years ago)

xpost, i do like the idea of grime as punk going against hip hop as prog. not sure if its that simple though.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Thursday, 2 December 2004 18:51 (twenty-one years ago)

I should clarify that I like crunk because I find it bloated, it's like total over-indulgence to my ears.

The Lex (The Lex), Thursday, 2 December 2004 18:53 (twenty-one years ago)

Stand Up Tall is a good pop song

Frankenstein On Ice (blueski), Thursday, 2 December 2004 18:56 (twenty-one years ago)

its sort of like a hardcore/rave type beat to my ears.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Thursday, 2 December 2004 18:57 (twenty-one years ago)

yes titchy but you're playing this too literal. and i think videos CAN be important. as i said, the song may not necess. be hip-hop but the video is.


, I can have your guts for garters/ Turn this place into a lyrical slaughter'

this reads like a terrible rhyme! unless it's deliberate

Frankenstein On Ice (blueski), Thursday, 2 December 2004 18:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Surely not hard and pounding enough?

xpost

The Lex (The Lex), Thursday, 2 December 2004 18:59 (twenty-one years ago)

"are you referring to stand up tall or fix up look sharp?"

whoops!

bugged out, Thursday, 2 December 2004 18:59 (twenty-one years ago)

re: "guts, garters, and lyrical slaughters"

yeah it sounds a bit naff. same as the rhyme 'from lampost to lampost, we run the road'. sounds like a road traffic control announcement. maybe the met will co-opt it for ads.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Thursday, 2 December 2004 19:00 (twenty-one years ago)

it's not a terrible rhyme when you listen to it. looks infinitely worse than it sounds. for the record that's one of my favourite tracks on the comp. she's just so incredibly ballsy and she spits like she's got a *real* beef with someone. it's the most aggressive bit of mic work i've heard in ages (it actually rivals vybz kartel on fa*got correction, his answer to assassin's eediat ting on the stepz rhythm - and he sounds like he's ready to *kill* someone!)

stelfox, Thursday, 2 December 2004 21:29 (twenty-one years ago)

"From lampost to lampost, we run the road" is a great line, a quintessentially grime boast. So much of the best grime has contained within itself an awareness of the inherent ridiculousness of using prissy English vocabulary and accents to make gangsta-style threats and boasts, but it goes ahead and does it anyway, which I love. Most of my favourite grime MCs do this to some extent, and it's a huge part of Showtime's appeal certainly.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Thursday, 2 December 2004 22:31 (twenty-one years ago)

I actually like the line "I'll have your guts for garters", but I can definitely see where rhyming it with "Turn this place into a lyrical slaughter" would strike some people as a bit meh. I really like the line "from lampost to lampost, we run the road", it just sounds so perfectly London. It's a grime line, one you couldn't imagine an American rapper saying, but working beautifully in the context it's used in.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 2 December 2004 22:38 (twenty-one years ago)

'stand up tall' is a gd mid-way point between pop and grime as in pirate proper grime.

'and half the time, it sounds OTT and forced. they could at least do it with some more conviction. much as i like cock back, they sound a bit ridiculous and cartoonish.'

er yeah well its cartoonish - what with songs titled like 'pow!' (god I can't actually remember 'cock back', I'm not sure I've heard it grr!). I actually like that (in the two versions I've heard) they don't overuse the 'pow!' shout out tho'. I find the whole 'I'll break your jaw' 'I'll crack your skull' type talk far funnier than 'happy talk' or 'pies'. Would an album full of 'itchy and scratchy' type cartoonish violence with grime-pop beats be too much to ask? huh?

martin make us a comp!

x-posts

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 2 December 2004 22:39 (twenty-one years ago)

Presumably she said "slarta" though, yeah? As in Slarta John? xpost

I'm momentarily forgetting, what's the song with Crazy Titch and I think JME and Lethal B's "ARGH! LETHAL B's GOT A GUN!" Maybe my favourite grime track of the year (at least on some days), but definitely the best for cartoonish violence.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Thursday, 2 December 2004 22:41 (twenty-one years ago)

"martin make us a comp!"

HE DID! That's what this thread is about!

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 2 December 2004 22:41 (twenty-one years ago)

I know alex - I mean a comp of other grime tunes with 'cartoonish violence' theme (reply to tinchy's post - sort of...making a bad late night joke).

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 2 December 2004 22:45 (twenty-one years ago)

"I can have your guts for garters/ Turn this place into a lyrical slaughter" isn't supposed to rhyme - the next line is something along the lines of "Think I'm an orthodox daughter?/Think I'm an orthodox daughter?"

Jason J, Thursday, 2 December 2004 22:54 (twenty-one years ago)

""From lampost to lampost, we run the road" is a great line, a quintessentially grime boast. So much of the best grime has contained within itself an awareness of the inherent ridiculousness of using prissy English vocabulary and accents to make gangsta-style threats and boasts, but it goes ahead and does it anyway, which I love. Most of my favourite grime MCs do this to some extent, and it's a huge part of Showtime's appeal certainly."

yeah i love wileys pies, and dizzee saying 'i havent got the foggiest' but when its meant to sound hard or rude, its almost lightweight. maybe the delivery isnt confident enough but i dont hear the smirk you refer to. i dont know - it just sounds, as reynolds says, too quaint. i never really paid it any attention anyway, until the review. and its just a single line, it goes fine in the song.

the line i did have a small prob with was the one in mic fight about (im going from memory here) 'its just london living, money guns, weed cars and women'. that was a bit lame.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Friday, 3 December 2004 00:02 (twenty-one years ago)

four weeks pass...
i should probably preface by saying that reynolds is great before his fans shoot me down, but on his new blog entry, he does admit he has never been a hip hop fan, much less a british hip hop fan, as such, something which came across to me quite clearly in his energy flash book. just thought that might be of interest regarding the earlier (and some later) comments in this thread. i dont think hes even a soul/funk fan either, from some of the other things hes written - i think he has a love/hate relationship with it, which also came across in his energy flash book, as he seems to go to lengths to relate rave and dance to previous eras in rock, but not so much with soul or funk. this is probably just because thats the musical background he came from.

titchyschneider (titchyschneider), Sunday, 2 January 2005 17:16 (twenty-one years ago)

five months pass...
Find threads from I Love Music, subject contains 'grime'.

72 results found:

DAEREST V1CE MAGAZINE!!!!! (ex machina), Friday, 17 June 2005 20:41 (twenty-one years ago)

four months pass...
even we have to admit this compilation isnt that great

vicemagazine, Wednesday, 19 October 2005 15:28 (twenty years ago)

nine months pass...
even we have to admit this compilation isnt that great

-- vicemagazine (vicelan...), October 19th, 2005.


AHAHAHAHA..

Aditya (dan138zig), Monday, 31 July 2006 01:16 (nineteen years ago)

Grime sucks.

Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Monday, 31 July 2006 09:30 (nineteen years ago)

Mime sucks.

alext (alext), Monday, 31 July 2006 09:49 (nineteen years ago)

Grindie changed everything.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 31 July 2006 09:51 (nineteen years ago)

one year passes...

he moved away because he saw the way things in this once glorious country were heading. if it wasnt for the erosion of traditional english culture, we might still be able to boast one of its true exponents (mr reynolds, in case you were unsure) right here where he belongs.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Thursday, 29 November 2007 11:07 (eighteen years ago)

i am pretty sure i saw bruza on the 73 in stokey the other week. he seemed to have a sweetboy jheri perm thing going on. it were odd.

r|t|c, Thursday, 29 November 2007 11:28 (eighteen years ago)

Grindie changed everything.
-- Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 31 July 2006 09:51 (1 year ago) Bookmark Link

^^^true

Dom Passantino, Thursday, 29 November 2007 11:29 (eighteen years ago)

This thread = "Why Dissensus Is Necessary" part 379.
-- Marcello Carlin, Wednesday, 24 November 2004 15:50 (3 years ago) Bookmark Link

4-5-1

Dom Passantino, Thursday, 29 November 2007 11:32 (eighteen years ago)

i wonder if nu-look nme will be employing dissensus contributrs.

that would certainly bump its sales.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Thursday, 29 November 2007 11:34 (eighteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.